Matt Carr

https://mathstodon.xyz/@MBCarr

Topologist. Rare/complex diseases and statistical genetics. Postdoc at USC.

Los Angeles, CA: he/they idc

Public Key

npub1ftfj9cxv66urmlz932m7f5srrlg8vs3w5m5k3967xpt5hhgl3kesw6yj4s

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsy45ezurxddwpal3zc4dly6gp3l5rkggh2d6tgja0rq46tm50cmvcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmntrlpyqv

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

Author Public Key

npub1ftfj9cxv66urmlz932m7f5srrlg8vs3w5m5k3967xpt5hhgl3kesw6yj4s

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-25 01:52:40 GMT

- reply

i think the idea may be much simpler. it's still a little bit like a short in the dark, but from my understanding of the argument, it can be well-motivated. if the proof survives the inevitable rigorous review, i think we'll get a much shorter argument (thank god)

2026-08-24 21:03:39 GMT

- reply

it's not possible for me to really comment upon the proof itself because it's well outside my expertise, but just from having read parts of it myself, i understand just about as much as alpöge says—that's the snappy punchline of the paper. but it sweeps quite a bit under the rug because the remainder of all 100 or so pages is just about getting to that point.

2026-08-19 04:50:02 GMT

- reply

i'm not sure if this is what you mean or are looking for, but it is true that that corresponding sequence of gaussian measures converge weak*-ly to the dirac mass, which captures exactly what you say about how physicists might speak of it.