Beef

Bos Taurus
Grass-Fed, Grass-Finished
westonaprice.org
"You are what you eat!"

Public Key

npub1g8knsg42jzeka0f7mgsqglj9gxmdw3qgptg6ggkurn9w8eaqmxysg5q2t9

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsyrmfcy24fpvmwh5ld5gqy0ez5rdkhgsyq45dyytwpejhru7sdnzgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsd8f25k

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1g8knsg42jzeka0f7mgsqglj9gxmdw3qgptg6ggkurn9w8eaqmxysg5q2t9

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-01-28 18:43:20

- reply

@npub12qh…wqrt
All these posts suck

2024-01-28 18:12:48

- reply

@npub18ec…c8r8
When you say you want to learn and then say it's retarded, you sound even more retarded

2024-01-28 07:42:30

- reply

@npub1gl8…q5y9
Please no for the love of the Holy Bovinity

2024-01-28 07:41:06

- reply

@npub1grk…elrn
That statue was a gift from Europe 🤣

2024-01-28 07:27:02

- reply

@npub1wun…36zy
Yes, and it's a good vibe

2024-01-28 07:20:10

- reply

@npub18ec…c8r8 @npub1xn0…ugrf @npub1wvj…nyah
As I said, the fatal flaw in this concept is that you need rational and moral people in order to keep this going. That's about 6% of any population, give or take 4%. That percentage needs to be 80+ for anarchism to have a chance.
The Spartans had a law forbidding their laws to be written. Their civilization operated that way for almost a millennium. You'd need that kind of understanding of anarchist principles for it to work.

2024-01-28 07:20:10

- reply

@npub18ec…c8r8 @npub1xn0…ugrf @npub1wvj…nyah
This process would require something very similar to courts, judges, lawyers, forensics experts, etc. But there would be as many providers as the market has demand for.
There would be bounties placed on suspected criminals who refuse to cooperate. There would be social and economic consequences, up to and including ostracism, for those who do not assist the process/protect the criminal, none of which have to violate the nonaggression principle.

2024-01-28 07:20:09

- reply

@npub18ec…c8r8 @npub1xn0…ugrf @npub1wvj…nyah
Since a crime would trigger many claims, the insurance company invests in security, preventing unsustainable payouts. This has the benefit of providing security to everyone in the area, policyholders or not.
In the event of a criminal act, a victim or group of victims is entitled to defend himself in any way, and this would stop crimes in many if not most cases.
If a criminal commits a crime and gets away with it, then you seek restitution.

2024-01-28 07:20:08

- reply

@npub18ec…c8r8 @npub1xn0…ugrf @npub1wvj…nyah
I gave up on anarchism years ago. It isn't going to work.
But I can explain the theory, which you got very wrong. Also, a lot depends on what flavor of anarchism you prefer. Mine was anarcho-capitalism.
First, you need rational and moral people (you can see we're already off to a near impossible start). They need to understand the first principles of justice, namely the golden rule and its converse, the nonaggression principle.

2024-01-28 07:20:08

- reply

@npub18ec…c8r8 @npub1xn0…ugrf @npub1wvj…nyah
Your question regards crime, defined in this context as a violation of the nonaggression principle. You have three ways of dealing with it: security, defense, and restitution.
We have very large public and private security sectors already. Anarchism simply says it should all be private. Instead of taxes, some "public" security could be funded by "crime insurance" premiums. Crime insurance would pay policyholders in the event a crime was committed in the area.

2024-01-28 04:13:03

- reply

@npub18ec…c8r8 @npub1xn0…ugrf
I think you're wrong, but dammit, you're so damn smart that I don't know if I can "proof" you wrong

2024-01-27 22:55:13

- reply

@npub1yaa…qqpk
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/830/139/732/274/848/original/4929701f6625c6ee.jpg

2024-01-27 18:34:48

- reply

@npub123m…a50p
The resemblance to Biden is much stronger
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/829/115/225/458/793/original/6c56e16c68293e16.jpg
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/829/115/322/592/102/original/52c26d351df09271.jpg
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/829/115/435/283/049/original/d7ac614b7e4570a0.jpg
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/829/115/721/740/133/original/78f0f83bf359fe94.jpg

2024-01-26 23:23:32

New NAS has the old CSB.
Old NAS needs a new CSB.
Introducing, Comic Strip Beef.
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/824/588/688/944/203/original/b1a5b646ad7620c9.png

2024-01-26 22:03:13

- reply

@npub1wag…f952
Thanks for sharing.
This information is so good it makes me think you're a spook 😂

2024-01-26 10:09:06

- reply

@npub1ya5…6sgw
What do you care? Freeze peach bitch

2024-01-26 00:56:39

What's happened to NAS is a prelude to what will happen to America.
Open borders fill the place with douchebags, meaning decent people will have to flee their homes just to preserve some standard of living.

2024-01-26 00:13:58

- reply

@npub1vgz…l43s
We're going to build a wall
And Canada will pay for it

2024-01-25 23:46:49

- reply

@npub1mvn…0hjl @npub1rp2…9n8q
You insinuated that I shouldn't say things because I get them backwards

2024-01-25 23:38:06

- reply

@npub1mvn…0hjl @npub1rp2…9n8q
So, what, I shouldn't say these things?

2024-01-25 21:29:41

- reply

@npub1mvn…0hjl @npub1rp2…9n8q
I'm glad my endorsement is so highly regarded

2024-01-25 21:28:33

- reply

@npub1jk2…mh4j
The "Michelle Obama is a man" memes were one of the most popular memes before eriner started the new NAS. This is just a post about how those memes suck

2024-01-25 19:45:02

- reply

@npub1v20…fuf7 @npub1dgr…8xrh @npub1gxv…hh99
Turns out this is from January 2013

2024-01-25 18:31:50

- reply

@npub1v20…fuf7 @npub1dgr…8xrh @npub1gxv…hh99
Imagine how pissed are the people who hired him.
🤣🤣🤣

2024-01-25 18:22:58

Is freeze peach a means or an end?
A means serves an end, and an end serves nothing. Should a means ever conflict with an end, the means must compromise, not the end.
If the end is compromised, and the means remains whole, then the means is treated as the end.
Free speech is a means to a healthy community.
Freeze peach absolutism elevates free speech to an end. It shall not be compromised for the community, but the health of the community shall be compromised in the name of freeze peach.

2024-01-25 17:31:48

- reply

@npub1e8q…rewz
Here I go overthinking it: it's not realistic that they would buy vowels i, o, and u before e and a, or pick letters like k, y, and g before l and t.

2024-01-25 07:45:03

- reply

@npub1ppx…x9rx
He's only back in order to campaign against Trump.
The problem is he can't convincingly vouch for Biden.
So it seems they're going to swap Biden out for someone, probably Michelle. It just has to be someone that Stewart can sell without his old fan base thinking he's a total fraud.

2024-01-25 02:11:49

- reply

@npub1q8n…kct8
Democrats don't get what they want, they do what they're told. How else do you think Joe Biden is president?

2024-01-24 23:27:11

- reply

@npub1q8n…kct8
Dean Phillips is going nowhere. I think Biden will be swapped out for Michelle Obama.

2024-01-24 23:25:06

- reply

@npub1wag…f952
I don't. I'm really not sure what any of that meant.
All I'm doing is calling out NAS for posting memes about Big Mike. Seemed like every time I logged in about a quarter of the posts were about Michelle Obama being a man and having a dick.
I frequently pointed out that there was no evidence for this. That didn't slow anyone down, not one. That means these assholes don't care about truth, they are obsessed with her. Hence my thesis:
NAS worships Michelle's big black tranny cock.

2024-01-24 20:55:09

- reply

@npub14m4…23su @npub1n28…vyjn @npub18su…nd38
Thank you for the honor. I'm not sure I deserve it but I'll accept it.
Saying there's nothing better about the new NAS than my absence proves my point, it is a worthless instance. None of you provide value.

2024-01-24 19:09:57

- reply

@npub19sl…wf0t
There has to be only one real reason: chicks couldn't control themselves around a guy with that look

2024-01-24 18:52:52

- reply

@npub1n28…vyjn
@npub18su…nd38
No Authority Social: A bunch of fags worshipping black tranny cock

2024-01-24 17:31:53

- reply

@npub1n28…vyjn
You fags enjoy Big Mike dick pics

2024-01-24 14:08:27

Eriner's anarchist agenda ruined No Agenda Social.
Eriner's authority will ruin No Authority Social.

2024-01-22 17:23:06

- reply

@npub14dn…erww
Sounds like you didn't understand a word I said

2024-01-22 01:14:30

- reply

@npub1w6v…exxg
They've been mulling over contingency plans for some time now.
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/796/713/460/556/542/original/f495c774ec8955f6.png

2024-01-22 01:08:04

- reply

@npub1jw9…ewak
"He couldn't hang with the cool kids"
You sound like a 45yo acting like an 11yo. I can't imagine anybody in your life taking you seriously.
At least you're one of the cool kids though

2024-01-22 01:03:33

- reply

@npub14m4…23su
Doesn't help the case one bit. He'd rather comply with the state rather than serve the community that depends on him. He'd rather grant douchebags immunity than clean up the instance.
He obeys the state and douchebags. How benevolent!
This is what anarchism gets you. You get a hyper-rationalism that is divorced from any sense of community.
It will work for a short time. Eventually, though, people will leave due to lack of genuine connection.

2024-01-21 23:49:10

- reply

@npub14m4…23su
Thought it over some more, here's my Beef: I spent a considerable amount of time and resources in an anarchist "community". It basically consisted of a couple dozen eriners.
They're not communists or bad people, but they don't know the first thing about community (neither does eriner). These people deny any communitarian principle because it would overthrow their radical individualism. So you don't get much community.
They're the last people you'd want a community to depend on.

2024-01-21 21:58:54

- reply

@npub14m4…23su
I suppose I have a Beef with anarchism. I posted a few days ago that I was an anarchist for 8 years.
My Beef with anarchism is that I thought it was the pinnacle of moral intellect. What I found is that anarchists are nowhere near as moral or intellectual or as well read as they think they are.
They're dimwits posing as intellectuals, and I was one of them for so long.

2024-01-21 20:30:09

- reply

"But who gets to decide who's a douchebag and who isn't?"
In short, the community does.
Obviously someone has to make the decisions of who to remove and who to allow to stay. This responsibility may become an abused power.
If so, the community can replace him. Freezepeach isn't the only way to solve this problem.
"You don't get it bro, moderation never works. Freezepeach is the only way because all moderators are tyrants."
Wat je zegt ben jezelf, met je kop door de helft.

2024-01-21 20:30:09

- reply

Putting community first would mean responding to what the community wants and needs.
Community requires cultivation and preservation. Failure to cultivate it results in a slow death; failure to preserve it results in a quick death.
The freezepeach policy, arguably necessary for cultivation, failed to protect NAS from assholes and douchebags. The community, because of the scale it reached, requires a firmer moderation policy.

2024-01-21 20:30:09

- reply

Therefore, I do not advocate for censorship. I advocate for a realignment of the primary and subordinate goals.
Specifically, I advocate that the needs of the community, cultivation and preservation, must be primary, meaning this must be the deciding factor whenever it clashes with any other goal.
Removing assholes and douchebags is not censorship, it is community preservation.
You could compare it to weeding a garden.

2024-01-21 20:30:09

- reply

Such a policy is said to violate an anarchist principle and therefore would compromise the primary goal of NAS.
Remember, the primary goal of NAS is the establishment of an anarchist agenda.
In a conflict between a primary goal and a secondary goal, the primary goal is served and the secondary goal is not.
Memes and shitposts are symptoms of a problem, not the cause.
Censorship is ineffectual because it only treats the symptoms, not the cause. It often produces more of the symptoms.

2024-01-21 20:30:09

Why NAS failed and will fail again:
Community is a secondary, not the primary goal.
The primary goal of NAS is to establish an anarchist agenda.
Regardless of the merits of an anarchist agenda, it conflicts with the founding principle and namesake of the show that this community is based on.
This conflict is the primary source of all that precipitated the failure of NAS. A second failure is inevitable.
It is avoidable by putting community first.

2024-01-20 21:55:11

Excellent performance by the frontrunner
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/790/267/469/757/686/original/72a630887b415e50.png

2024-01-20 21:53:28

- reply

@npub1vex…ajzw
Fare thee well, Masshole 😂

2024-01-20 17:37:51

Life just hasn't been the same since people stopped posting that Michelle Obama is a man.
I thought I was on NAS for the community. Turns out it was for Big Mike dick pics.

2024-01-20 06:18:34

I just found out that in Greek, Leia means booty.
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/786/584/272/095/811/original/de5a58b55fd15cbc.jpg

2024-01-20 00:24:19

- reply

He says the Jewish tunnels were connected to Epstein's house, and that Javier Milei visited these tunnels after his election victory.
And there's some evidence of that visit:
https://www.jta.org/2023/11/27/global/argentinas-president-elect-javier-milei-visits-lubavitcher-rabbis-grave-to-offer-thanks-for-his-surprise-victory

2024-01-20 00:15:03

Benjamin Fulford explains everything
https://rumble.com/v47yat2-benjamin-fulford-update-today-january-19-2024-benjamin-fulford.html
Regarding SecDef Lloyd Austin: he and Marine Commandant Eric Smith have been arrested by "whitehats" for planning a false flag operation that would impose martial law on the US

2024-01-20 00:10:49

- reply

@npub1s76…3z3c
I hadn't seen this guy in years. Good to see he's going strong

2024-01-19 23:26:06

- reply

@npub1n2d…xt03
Sometimes they do. To say otherwise is pure cynicism.
Anarchists will never admit it, but the truth is they depend on principles of justice that are established and enforced by law. Take due process for example. Anarchists take due process for granted. What do they do to safeguard this principle - anything? The state upholds due process (to the chagrin of would-be despots).
If authorities were never wise or prudent, then how has due process been upheld over the centuries?

2024-01-19 19:57:01

- reply

Granted, it's never perfectly just. But the human condition seems not to allow for perfect justice among men - with or without authority.
But the level of justice attainable with authority, supposing the just members of society use the authority wisely and prudently, is much greater than the level of justice attainable by hoping people know it and establish it on their own.
Tl;dr: The "No Authority" tagline is shortsighted anarchism based on paper-thin logic.

2024-01-19 19:57:01

- reply

"There is no just authority," say anarchists.
They say authorities use and threaten the use of force on people who have committed no crime; therefore any action they take is an act of injustice.
The anarchist ideal is one where everyone understands and obeys the first principle of justice, Do No Harm, aka the nonaggression principle.
Authority, by definition, violates this principle, therefore there is no just authority, therefore there should be No Authority.

2024-01-19 19:57:01

- reply

This logic is sound, but paper thin. Man is capable of reason, but Man is not a rational animal. Man is, first and foremost, a passionate animal; Most men don't listen to reason.
"He who lives in obedience to passion cannot hear any advice that would dissuade him, nor understand it if he did ... Passion does not yield to Reason but to brute force."
Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics
This is the reason why authority must exist. And if authority exists, it must be just, else it defeats the purpose.

2024-01-19 19:57:01

- reply

"Your reasoning is circular," say anarchists. "You say most men listen to passion, not reason. So you must expect authorities to be comprised of passionate men, not reasonable men. Then you get greater atrocities, because their use of force fallaciously justified. Authority always defeats its own purpose."
This isn't true because authorities have at times been comprised of good, reasonable men. Sustainable justice and order have been successfully established in various times and places.

2024-01-19 19:57:00

- reply

The new instance No Authority Social gets its name from anarchism. At a very deep level, I understand this sentiment. The atrocities committed, tragedies produced, and hypocrisies sustained by authorities can produce the most indignant rage.
Eventually, I was compelled to accept that this doesn't constitute a valid refutation of authority. This is a confutation of authority with injustice.
Indignant rage is misdirected at authority rather than the true culprit, injustice.

2024-01-19 19:57:00

I considered myself an anarchist for eight years. I joined anarchist communities in person and online, read as much anarchist philosophy as I could, and lived in accordance with anarchist precepts to the farthest extent possible.
I could (and probably still can) patiently tear apart any justification for the state.
In recent years, I've found that this is a terribly shortsighted ideology. If you care why I feel this way, feel free to ask. But that's not the point of this post.

2024-01-19 07:16:39

- reply

@npub126n…y4cy
Socrates said it first. Read Phaedo

2024-01-18 21:43:18

- reply

@npub18su…nd38
Is it impossible to come to an agreement on what a douchebag or an asshole is, and then make being a douchebag or asshole bannable?
I don't suggest this is easy, just that it's possible. I also suggest that the health of the community depends on it.
After all, if a community can't agree whether someone's an asshole or not, it's not much of a community.

2024-01-18 16:11:14

True or false:
The new NAS is a thriving community with lots of valuable and entertaining posts

2024-01-17 15:49:54

- reply

@npub1n28…vyjn
I'm here and not going anywhere.

2024-01-17 15:05:40

- reply

@npub12py…8c26
Adam became upset some time ago that douchebags have been ruining the instance and that the No Agenda name represented by douchebags.
Eriner's solution to this was a name change. That required a new instance because if this instance were to change its name, it wouldn't be federated anymore.
So the new instance should be full of producers. Hopefully it's not full of douchebags.

2024-01-17 14:52:33

- reply

@npub15tp…649k
Still, the refusal to ban anyone makes the instance go to shit. We have hard evidence of that now.
It's probably more than a refusal based on ideological grounds. It's probably cowardice. "Freeze peach" advocates are scared to ban douchebags because they fear retaliation from douchebags.
Non-douchebags, who regularly mute and block DBs, aren't going to retaliate and raise hell about DBs getting removed. Only DBs will.
That's who eriner fears and obeys. And/or, that's who he is.

2024-01-17 07:54:35

I will not be migrating to No Authority Social.
This whole debate and migration process is a tragic clusterfuck. So many producers are left out in the cold with little to no assistance.
As I've argued over the past week, the reason it's come to this is because of the stubborn refusal to remove douchebags from the instance.
This refusal comes from thickheaded anarchism, the notion that any such action amounts to gross tyranny.
"Freeze peach" deserves more contempt and ridicule than it gets.

2024-01-16 06:17:55

- reply

@npub1ks9…06z9
I don't think Adam is moving. JCD might and supposedly already has.
A lot of people won't be going because they 1) they won't log in before this server shuts down, 2) they don't know how to migrate and aren't getting help, 3) it's not worth it
I'm in camp 3 myself

2024-01-12 19:19:03

The problem with NAS is douchebaggery (not memes).
In V4V terms, NAS provides value as a hub to the NA community. But the non-moderation policy provides more value to douchebags than to non-douchebags because it puts a burden on non-douchebags to frequently mute/block as necessary.
Douchebags don't have this burden. They face little to no repercussions for their douchebag behavior. Thus non-douchebags are alienated.
NAS needs moderation if it's to be of value to non-douchebags.

2024-01-11 14:24:51

- reply

@npub1v8y…s6vc
All you had to say was Willem Dafoe

2024-01-08 16:20:43

- reply

@npub16ne…thh0
That's not evidence. Nor are the ruffles in her clothing when she walks or dances.
You have no evidence, and you refuse to do any research about her childhood. That evidence would prove the theory wrong.
Why is this such a big deal to you?

2024-01-03 05:20:36

- reply

@npub1vny…74p3 @npub10l0…y9fk
You're not a pro unless you at least know about Festool

2024-01-02 04:27:40

- reply

@npub1d76…cwgw
What about knights and douchebags?

2023-12-29 18:09:30

- reply

@npub1y29…c5qg
What's funny about this is that extreme leftists say the democrat party is right wing and constantly trending further to the right

2023-12-22 19:32:06

- reply

@npub1yq4…qf5h @npub1akw…zjlt @npub1whf…czvn
You are correct to call me sir, for I am a Knight of the No Agenda Roundtable

2023-12-22 18:49:26

- reply

@npub1whf…czvn
I support muting your profile
This is not of interest to No Agenda listeners/Gitmo Nation

2023-12-22 17:19:21

- reply

@npub1j8u…az5s
Full video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcZPOuI-vcU

2023-12-22 12:53:13

- reply

@npub1vrv…97jm
Points 2, 4, and 5 have nothing to do with the shape of the earth.
Point 3, the total eclipse is a small section but the partial eclipse is at least two thousand miles wide. Very stupid point.
Point 1, very interesting, deserves to be looked at.
Flat earthers have a much harder time answering questions. None of them have a workable astronomic model, they can't predict any astronomic event with greater accuracy than the conventional model

2023-12-22 04:47:21

- reply

@npub1aw6…gtmz @npub10l0…y9fk
On the other hand, it's fun when a woman asks for a stud finder and you get to respond, "What do you need that for, I'm right here!"

2023-12-21 22:01:53

- reply

@npub1pe4…cmgm
Mavericks are cattle that do their own thing

2023-12-20 21:25:03

- reply

@npub1m7p…w0ed @npub14m4…23su
Sure did
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/614/617/311/081/210/original/bde3574f31d731fb.jpg

2023-12-20 05:06:42

- reply

@npub14m4…23su @npub1m7p…w0ed
There's no way that nose isn't photoshopped

2023-12-18 18:04:15

- reply

@npub152n…5cjc
If you want some audio warfare suggestions, just ask. I can prescribe some of the gnarliest, most grotesque horror metal and noisecore ever created

2023-12-12 18:28:36

San Francisco vegan restaurant puts grass-fed Beef on the menu to stay in business
A sign of healing
https://www.sfgate.com/la/article/vegan-restaurants-adding-meat-los-angeles-18527772.php

2023-12-12 01:53:35

- reply

@npub1ajv…tppj
Also, while it's a huge book and difficult to read, Rousseau's Emile is an incredible take on libertarian parenting. He's constantly criticizing the foolishness of society. The main idea behind it is that nature provides most of the lessons and that parents need to get out of nature's way.

2023-12-12 01:50:51

- reply

@npub1ajv…tppj
"Instead of inculcating that sublime maxim of rational justice, Do to others as you would have them do unto you, inspires all men with that other maxim of natural goodness, much less perfect indeed, but perhaps more useful; Do good to yourself with as little evil as possible to others."

2023-12-12 01:50:42

- reply

@npub1ajv…tppj
Most libertarians eschew a biblical origin of humanity and civilization. Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality fleshes out a "natural" origin of civilization. While libertarians don't believe every detail, they believe in the fundamental notions, chief of which is the appeal to nature, the image of the primitive man, and of course the origin of the state. He also states the non-aggression principle in his own way:

2023-12-12 00:56:47

- reply

@npub1ajv…tppj
Used to be a standard feature on cars, the vent window. Open it all the way and you get cool air directly on you:
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/564/489/099/768/566/original/fa06c6990ac96c1d.jpg

2023-12-05 22:19:09

- reply

@npub1v4t…w5q2
Those bison heifers are lookin' good 🦬

2023-12-05 08:23:09

Amazon is using AI to summarize customer reviews. This is placed above all the real people reviews
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/526/607/845/503/608/original/9403ea0b40f30e7c.png

2023-12-04 16:20:47

- reply

@npub1q8n…kct8
Nietzsche is the worst

2023-12-04 00:55:12

- reply

@npub1fvt…ywkw
After some digging, I've confirmed that it's misattributed.

2023-12-04 00:28:53

- reply

@npub1fvt…ywkw
As a veteran and a scholar, I really want to know where he said that. Nobody cites this quote, and it drives me crazy. I have to assume it's misattributed to him.

2023-12-02 08:38:02

- reply

@npub16ne…thh0
"The people do not easily change, they love their own ancient customs; and it is by small degrees only that laws replace one another; so the ancient laws will remain."
-Aristotle, Politics Book 4 Chapter 5

2023-12-01 06:09:12

- reply

@npub1jk2…mh4j
Find a "great books" curriculum
https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/503/432/157/179/832/original/ff52b1ac0a298ad6.jpg

2023-12-01 05:50:47

No rock band is as cool as Clutch
Six minutes of instrumental jamming out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juI5y32m4tw

2023-11-20 09:58:28

- reply

@npub1alf…yyx4
I beg to differ

2023-11-19 01:34:02

- reply

@npub10zp…fz5n
I know I read Acts, but it still feels like the first time I've read that.

2023-11-18 22:06:50

- reply

@npub10zp…fz5n
Remphan is new to me

2023-11-17 02:01:51

- reply

@npub1d4k…gjhx
In case you need an alternative:
https://www.grittyrockradio.com/