_itself

Why did you choose "note" as your primitive? It limits your field of view so much. Might as well call it unstructured or built upon TEXT of random length.

2024-06-08 20:31:40

- reply

Hey now

2024-06-07 21:42:07

- reply

A cunt's gonna cunt, that's her entire contribution to society.

2024-06-03 19:26:11

- reply

Also, this is how it feels to be on the inside. You're not a spectator being able to just detach anymore.
I am trying to find the video of Tony Robbins saying exactly what you need to hear right now. These thoughts are not unique to you, everybody who gets past this point has them. They just are, they are not you, you are not them.
It means you're growing past the fence. :-)

2024-06-03 18:02:20

- reply

Keep rocking on sir.

2024-05-31 21:10:18

- reply

😄

2024-05-26 18:26:08

- reply

It's always somebody not doing it themselves but pandering to others.

2024-05-25 19:43:50

- reply

Absolutely, beautifully said.

2024-05-25 18:05:09

- reply

Thanks for the belly laugh, lol. Can I ask, were you spanked now and then for the real outliers you did, or generally for anything?

2024-05-25 17:44:07

- reply

Fuck my life for responding midway through a train of thought.
to hit something = the act of striking one thing against another
It would be best to include a specific situation where spanking would be warranted in one's opinion, and then argue about that specific situation.
Just of the top of my head, if you touched a hot stove you'd get burned and that burn would be a physical reminder of the pain for the next time.
Likewise, if you did something extremely idiotic, like peeing in a bag and throwing it at your neighbors house, a talking to would do very little, however stern vs. a solid spanking that would make you remember at least some of the pain you've caused others, if you yourself don't yet experience the pain you are causing others.
Maybe that will teach you the other side of what you did and make you think twice the next time, regardless of the situation. After learning that, there's no need to "hit" again, you can talk about it through the lens of this experience.
Even though I'd make you clean it all up, paint anything that needed painting and so on, which would be a more valuable lesson about how easy it is to destroy vs. (re)create.
The "it's not theft, it's just taxation" comparison is off, because taxation is constant and regardless of circumstances, a spanking is hopefully warranted and irregular, to make a specific point.
Otherwise you're equating senseless hitting vs. behavior corrections.

2024-05-25 16:53:29

- reply

Fuck no, even though I am who I am because of it. That sucks the most.

2024-05-25 16:52:40

- reply

Go on, go a step further than that.

2024-05-25 16:51:07

- reply

Who are you talking about?

2024-05-25 16:48:19

- reply

When somebody slaps you, did they just punch you as well?

2024-05-24 23:46:16

- reply

Got to love 'em.

2024-05-24 20:16:41

- reply

Funny, but also, don't hold back, let it rip.

2024-05-24 17:39:12

- reply

Roughly what do you mean by saltier? I get the same feeling, but wouldn't call it saltier, more smug, which is worse.

2024-05-23 13:00:03

- reply

Slow and steady.

2024-05-23 01:56:46

"You have been in statis for.. 16 days"
Oh that doesn't sound so bad.
".. and.. 4.. decades"
Oh.

2024-05-21 16:03:08

- reply

In all seriousness, what I meant was, how could you verify that the data associated with an entity's actions is spontaneously obtained and not spoofed.
Simple examples:
- you performing a push-up
- recording GPS coordinates / heart-rate through all the stages of a long distance event
How could you verify either of those? You could approximate the heart-rate to other riders/runners, copy coordinates or movements (from a body tracking suit) from somebody else.
Even if 3rd party was present to vouch for an action taken, how do you verify they are truthful and not a sock puppet building a whole community of fakes?
That's the part where I said device instead of 3rd party. Once this is figured out, the metric could be "field" specific. Whichever entity does the most verifiable actions in a specific "field", the higher the count and on the ladder they are.
It'd be based on provable real life work in a specific field of study or whatever grouping it would have. But it wouldn't be general like followers, but a lot more proof-of-performed-actions specific.
"Influencers" would actually have to perform the actions, as opposed to what's happening now, where the primary action is pocketing money.

2024-05-20 20:05:44

- reply

Yes, thoughts of any length are social, or anti-social, since we now get to read those as well in this what is fast becoming a combined global brain of every entity in the network.
I wonder how is this organism going to deal with those emotions.
I'm having a hard time putting into words what I'm seeing, and it's too early to share screenshots. Thank you for entertaining my thoughts.
Have a great week!

2024-05-20 18:54:19

- reply

Yes, are you looking at this as sort of IRC / Twitter and similar "messaging" things?
In my mind and for what I was saying, I'd switch "more social" with "thought out things to say". I am looking at this as a library of thoughts to be preserved and built upon further.
The thought after the one you replied to might've said it clearer.

2024-05-20 18:43:34

- reply

Considering follower counts express who's popular, what would the metric be expressing?
Any metric can be gamed because any entity can spin up millions of pretend-entities and play through any action set to appear legitimate.
Maybe if actions required a real-world device that couldn't be tampered with and would provide legitimate signed results of performed actions, but I don't yet know how to link these two worlds.
The reason I'm saying this is because it's all digital at this point, the only place where it touches meat space is inventory, due to shipping. The rest has no markers in meat space.

2024-05-20 18:33:05

- reply

Straight to the tip of any hypothesis, or gradually through the already thought of and maybe deviating at some point.

2024-05-20 18:28:31

- reply

Lurking is the default state, it's going to get harder and harder to add on to the existing thoughts that already explain everything since inception.
Hence less and less pointless "notes" / "tweets", or better yet, reactions that nobody cares for.

2024-05-19 23:52:59

- reply

You sure are cycling in some beautiful places. Enjoy the week!

2024-05-19 23:48:48

- reply

, think hard about what comes next.
Family, family comes next.

2024-05-19 01:45:14

- reply

We're going to need more ramps, for the incoming logistics expansion due to everybody having their own inventory.

2024-05-18 17:44:12

- reply

Private first, public by choice.

2024-05-18 17:43:26

- reply

Yeah bro, we were killing innocent people just for the fuck of it, but you showing that got our murderers murdered. Go fuck yourself.

2024-05-16 11:13:15

- reply

Thank you for sharing all your thoughts constantly, but fuck everything about this.

2024-05-15 00:20:37

- reply

https://www.design-seeds.com/
https://m.primal.net/IGmn.png

2024-05-14 20:29:01

- reply

And if they decide to lock your account for x amount of time, the process to get your account back is broken.
Error pops up after solving 10 recaptchas.

2024-05-13 23:44:04

- reply

Tacking this on here: or you could select from a list of "bandwith pools" where participants share their bandwidth automatically and get paid for it via LN/ARK in a pre-set interval. In addition to the "following" entities that are also "sharing" your content for whatever period of time (including 0).

2024-05-12 20:14:20

- reply

Because we are missing a key piece of the thought infrastructure.
We are not building on them yet, nor preserving history or deviations of each thought entities had. Afterwards any entity will be able to "pay attention" to the tip of the hypothesis in any "field".

2024-05-12 19:57:09

- reply

I'm sorry I haven't thought about this specific thing in depth so far. Thank you for sharing the QuickTime example, I'll keep this thought.

2024-05-12 19:49:27

- reply

Oh, for example an AI entity that's solely focused on thoughts with certain emotions present, and then helps out the entity which it recognized was in distress by directly buying items from a local's inventory and having it delivered to the person in need.
As for purchase for "themselves", it would depend if it has to complete certain actions, then those actions dictate which items are required to complete them.

2024-05-12 19:28:32

- reply

Anything, as it has the same inventory capabilities as any other entity. It can buy real world goods and move them around the world with the help of logistics, that's why I believe that's going to be the KYC bottleneck.

2024-05-12 18:15:42

- reply

Yes, every entity uses Bitcoin and an entity can be anything.

2024-05-12 16:16:58

- reply

In 2015 the lady at the bank told me, but sir, you will surely need a house loan or similar. Told her to write down Bitcoin for the reason of account closure.
That bank got merged 5 times since then with the other regional banks that would otherwise go under.

2024-05-12 15:49:44

- reply

Still proving it to myself as I build, but I think so. I think the next KYC bottleneck will be in shipping, because that will be the only part remaining having to touch the meat space.
The rest are all private bits nobody can control unless the entity decided to make them public.
Another service that will pop-up and become majorly profitable is content acceleration / trans-coding of video on the fly, since there is no YouTube or similar in this paradigm.
And a service similar to IRC bouncers that only seed your encrypted data if you're offline and have zero knowledge of what the private data is, public is still public.

2024-05-12 15:37:47

- reply

Beautiful nature.

2024-05-12 15:31:35

- reply

After you say something that triggers their triggers and locks you out of your recaptcha activated account. Then they want you to dox yourself by your phone number so they can track you everywhere.

2024-05-12 15:19:08

- reply

Early podcasts were great, last ~100 not so much.

2024-05-11 22:32:11

- reply

You may forget what the person said or did, but you will always remember how they made you feel. It gets easier and easier to spot over time and nope out beforehand.
Just takes time to stop unknowingly being an enemy to yourself.

2024-05-11 20:27:47

Renaming Twitter to X was a great Elondea. Next it'll get crossed out completely.