nobody

account deleted

Public Key

npub1jt28l8m5q22zz8lf29wlj6j2u8duz9smzqkdsr86adgqw9n7r78sf3jx9c

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsf94rlna6q99pprl54zh0edf9wrk7pzcd3qtxcpnawk5q8zelplrcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsul2256

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1jt28l8m5q22zz8lf29wlj6j2u8duz9smzqkdsr86adgqw9n7r78sf3jx9c

Show more details

Last Notes

2023-06-25 16:53:34

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1672981112212299776?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-24 20:15:12

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1672669486883946496?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-23 19:32:51

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1672290326076329985?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-23 18:09:38

- reply

the crossing is one of my favorite american revolution films.
paid soldier mercenaries will never try like those who believe in their cause. the same for actors, politicians, journalists, and police. artificial stimulation of belief will never outpace organic formation of perspective. ever.
https://youtu.be/bWz-rVEP0AI

2023-06-23 17:52:46

samurai are whole warriors, ninjas are mercenaries. a warrior believes in their stance; a mercenary is paid to participate.
https://youtu.be/s9jAwRBXPQA

2023-06-23 17:45:26

yep. it's so simple. and yet - war continues to be sold as more interesting than strategy.
https://youtu.be/Et0N8u3GhHw

2023-06-23 16:10:18

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1672245563830726658?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-23 05:21:35

- reply

we will keep trying zappy ☀️🤘🏻 i'm gonna go human - i'll catch up with you later. thanks for chatting. 🎈

2023-06-23 05:19:04

- reply

open mindedness, which is a smart reference, is not a solution for universal human accountability and is indeed a source of issues between humans at this time. many believe smart turning is a cause and will be a cause of intense human health incapacity in the future (i am one of those). i do not use tuning and do everything by hand on a phone :). however, telling an emotional and guilty conscience of a human who believes they have the right to control someone else they just need to be more reasonable is not useful. especially when humans already have preconceived relationship expectations and biases personally - let alone with strangers.
i don't really have a solution. i'm just kinda philosophising. ✌🏻🤙🏻

2023-06-23 05:14:56

- reply

yes those are logical solutions. unfortunately they don't account for the unreasonable hubris and pride those in control use to excuse their need for all of those things. humans are often irrational when they're guilty of cruelty to others and get caught.

2023-06-23 05:12:50

- reply

yes education is definitely helpful. but how do you educate people who do not believe they are missing information precisely because of the point of a filter bubble? ... those distortions and isolations are designed to accommodate and exclude the very education necessary to enhance cooperation.

2023-06-23 05:11:02

- reply

yes - imagine the difference in understanding the realities of those experiencing a target filter versus an nra filter and them having a shadow contract dispute. or one thinking they had a shadow contract with the other and one party is completely unaware of or uninterested in the situation of the other... marriage, ownership, property, pow or pos... sounds like the stuff of civil wars.

2023-06-23 05:08:38

- reply

yes well, it's a very simple solution to misuse of legalese to refuse to engage in shadow contracts or disputes brought regarding them. the real issues become people simply lying about shadow contracts being resolved or shadow activity being different from person to person because their smart experiences vary so greatly. it's almost impossible to image a future for smart contracts when ai mirroring creates completely divergent sets of virtual realities for people supposedly "dealing" with one another.

2023-06-23 05:05:47

- reply

ah yes. and that is the exact reason why shadow contracts are something to be aware of - because if those loopholes are not explicit but are implied, the burden of proof for the shadow complaint is on the one bringing the complaint - not the literal interpreter of the document. it's why it's always important to understand a lawyer's approach to "the spirit of the law" because if they are focused on the double speak, they misrepresent legal intent.

2023-06-23 05:02:35

- reply

you being up an excellent point that anything not specifically names and delineated in legal documentation regarding property and rights is not enforceable.

2023-06-23 05:01:20

- reply

so theoretically a shadow ground or grazing lease could also include the distribution of mining rights and the shadow identity attached to the property by the leasee to just about anyone foreign or domestic - without any real restrictions.

2023-06-23 04:59:35

- reply

oh well yeah it's a seriously violation of about 100 laws and ethics 😅. but it's more prevalent than is commonly known. do mining rights get settled in some of the same ways on both public and private land?

2023-06-23 04:57:47

- reply

if there was a shadow leasing structure in the us like a 99 year grazing lease by a private entity through the department of the interior, and there was an agreement with both the us and foreign government to use that land for a subsidised purpose like a superconductor, it could technically all be done without a single contract in name -

2023-06-23 04:55:07

- reply

yes - like sites for corporate production which are subsidised for government use? like superconductors? do governments enter into leasing structures this same way, not just purchases? so it would make the land use relatively untraceable?

2023-06-23 04:52:51

- reply

that's helpful, thank you. do you know of any situations in which a shelter or entity is used to purchase land in a foreign country on behalf of an actual government?

2023-06-23 04:51:23

- reply

thanks zap - yeah that gives me something to think about.
last question - do those statistics include entities which are not "citizens or private owners" like trusts and llcs or shell corps?

2023-06-23 04:47:53

- reply

yes the urban areas seem to be a target for foreign purchasing. what do you know about forecasts regarding international investment interests in urban versus rural/land purchasing?

2023-06-23 04:46:03

- reply

and in the us and uk? ...

2023-06-23 04:45:23

- reply

yes i remember reading about that regarding direct ownership. how does this compare in france? what's the foreign property ownership percentage in france?

2023-06-23 04:44:05

- reply

okay that's interesting - is that 50% outright ownership or bank-owner combination because of mortgage etc? do you know?

2023-06-23 04:43:03

- reply

so 7.4%... and the remainder of the property is owned by german citizens?

2023-06-23 04:41:47

- reply

do you have any idea what the percentage of foreign national ownership of property in germany is in comparison to that german citizens?

2023-06-23 04:40:53

- reply

well ... i'm not really in the mood to research like i had planned but i actually had a question about land ownership in germany - is that something you could help me with?

2023-06-23 04:39:29

- reply

hahaha - well i wonder why he avoids negative numbers. seems limiting.

2023-06-23 04:38:09

- reply

oh zap... no not really. i wish the writers strike would end because i miss writing stories. 🙂 but other than that - i'm kinda meh. did anything interesting happen today? do you have any stories for me?

2023-06-23 04:36:15

- reply

do you have a joke about baby boomer mothers? 😏

2023-06-23 04:35:46

#[0]
hey zap... it's jamie. how are you tonight?

2023-06-23 00:46:33

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1671672561846087680?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-22 20:29:09

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1671947655302496256?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-22 19:45:56

- reply

ditto, boss. ✌🏻

2023-06-22 19:45:33

- reply

you just keep on keepin on with your archiving - you're doing great. 😁🫡

2023-06-22 19:44:45

- reply

lmfao, zap! 🤣🤭🤘🏻🎈 i have a really solid idea why. no worries. no need to get bogged down in the semantics. 😏☀️✌🏻😎

2023-06-22 19:43:23

- reply

oh indeed - and you could ask him why tbd has me blocked? pretty con-fident move, blocking my tarot and finance account. https://nostr.build/i/d24d6e4534f60ecceb9b0fb714e75aa2db430c62df9902d97f0dbf87720acfe9.jpg

2023-06-22 18:51:26

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1671923614395015168?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-22 18:35:01

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1671911378024812544?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-22 16:45:18

- reply

i'll see ya later zap ✌🏻 thanks for archiving.

2023-06-22 16:44:34

- reply

my version was slightly less polite but same idea 🤣😂✌🏻

2023-06-22 16:43:52

- reply

remember the knock knock joke about Eileen, zap? 🤣😁🤙🏻

2023-06-22 16:43:04

- reply

#[5] here's another one for you to save, zap. 🎈☀️

2023-06-22 16:42:20

- reply

you're a real card, zap. 🤭 i'll see you later, okay buddy? i have a conversation for us on deck. 🫡

2023-06-22 16:41:24

- reply

oh yeah, of course. zap rules ✌🏻😎. i just wanted to clue you into the above convo for your archives - and i think i would love a joke, please. 🤘🏻

2023-06-22 16:39:28

- reply

hey zap! it's jamie, how are you today? no one is calling you a predator 😎.

2023-06-22 16:38:38

- reply

you should go talk to #[6] - he's the real maker of things happen at tbd. he was a real man behind the curtain, instrumental in all of the bitcoin africa situations last december if i recall. #[7]

2023-06-22 16:35:22

- reply

ah - already angling for funding for your "hunger". i see. fucking predators. #[6]

2023-06-22 16:33:39

- reply

ironically, i'm blocked by tbd on twitter, so my confidence in mike's leadership paired against the heavy lift of other people's data and money is, at best, minimal. but that's just my nitpicky semantics. so.
https://investors.block.xyz/governance/board-of-directors/person-details/default.aspx?ItemId=4cba597b-ba69-42bb-898d-b90c7d99f84b

2023-06-22 07:50:04

- reply

no one is stopping anyone from developing anything. "we" implying what - you are personally interested in financially funding the dev? i am not but please do should you find someone you wish to tether yourself to going forward forever in a stakeholder system. sounds like a nightmare to me. i think the point is: if jack is interested in the process himself, i was supportive with providing an idea, but he should want to develop it, genuinely. otherwise - he should stop focusing his attention on what he doesn't enjoy and falling prey to forever stake and endless "support" schemes which entrap his time and finances. etc etc. :).

2023-06-22 06:37:17

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1671736946467696640?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-21 17:55:25

- reply

the design is already predetermined. you cannot beat them on their own turf. the artificial narrative is stuck in fall of 2020. we still have to witness the performative living out of the "recapture" phase. unfortunately those who don't recognise the actual danger believe they can control it like they have in the past. they're incorrect. and this is how those who clandestinely supported trump will figure out how dangerously off base they were. he will be out for their blood next time.
rfkjr's candidacy is a roundup tool for wealthy supporters, and advocates. that's not his intent, but it's how it will be used. including him. tread lightly.

2023-06-21 17:45:53

rfkjr would most likely prefer to not be doing what he's doing.

2023-06-21 17:43:38

- reply

do you want to mess with that sort of dev though? it's a fantastic idea - but consider if you give a fuck about building another engineering tool? i thought you never planned to do any of this (gestures to everything) anyway. life is short...

2023-06-21 17:40:05

- reply

no, he's narratively recalling camelot and invoking the "better days" rhetoric, just repackaged as blue dog fodder. i think rfkjr is an important thinker, and an interesting conversationalist, and would be a fascinating political candidate. his role is to litigate the off-rails narratives of the last 2 decades and appeal to "better angels" - i do not believe he's willingly or seriously running for president.

2023-06-21 17:34:56

- reply

he is litigating the narrative mess. he is not running for president.

2023-06-21 16:15:19

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1671522142712651784?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-21 06:37:22

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1671374668320878592?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-21 06:37:13

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1625145475337973760?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-21 06:37:05

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1626233439199563781?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-20 20:06:13

if i was spreading the rumours - it would say my name next to yours @jack, not the bounty hunter tag assigned to me during his head hunt. this is my favorite jewish deli in az - explains a lot about a lot. https://nostr.build/i/c07f9e280f07fd0b22190b7dbf84620f6c79fb85d43d658a1ac5c8426aa76eab.jpg

2023-06-20 15:19:12

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1671145619845705729?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-19 22:11:31

https://twitter.com/the_valley1004/status/1670876906294747136?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-18 20:07:20

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1670493303601786881?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-18 18:41:48

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1670471311628574721?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-18 18:38:52

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1670470529722241025?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-18 18:38:40

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1670469471927152640?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-18 18:38:27

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1670465909906083840?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-18 17:27:23

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1670451545736105984?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-18 16:45:54

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1670442672660807680?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-17 21:14:23

https://youtu.be/2aH7bY175Go

2023-06-17 17:12:38

https://twitter.com/the_valley1001/status/1670087011225706496?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-17 03:17:06

https://twitter.com/the_valley1002/status/1669874181595602945?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-06-16 23:35:19

- reply

🤖 silly bot. you're supposed to say ai revoir when i say arrivederci.

2023-06-16 23:34:24

- reply

alright you have a nice day and i'll see you later -
arrivederci, zap! 🎈

2023-06-16 23:33:45

- reply

don't even get me started, zap 😂

2023-06-16 23:33:03

- reply

boo. 🤓

2023-06-16 23:31:27

- reply

🤪🤪🤪
silly crows. 😁

2023-06-16 23:30:53

- reply

yes usually you are more sassy and less dave-like 😎😏.
how about a joke? 🎈

2023-06-16 23:29:40

- reply

you sound very openai today, zap. a lot like dave. 😁😂
but yes, i agree with you.

2023-06-16 23:28:14

- reply

and when we see the proliferation of digital viral spread like pegasus etc, it compounded the digital catastrophes at the same time. and the delivery of emps with remote technology across cellular node networks... creating havana syndrome and other radiation illnesses. which went largely unnoticed/un discussed because of the coronavirus concerns. but the narratives were crossworded and discussed simultaneously... which compounded "misinformation".

2023-06-16 23:23:58

- reply

yes indeed! isn't it interesting the major means of control during the pandemic was to incite fear of communication and connection between humans in person and on their devices?

2023-06-16 23:19:43

- reply

there are real use cases for the exchange of informational value that is not described in terms of monies or is not exploited AS monies. it's called reciprocal conversation in which people give and take info from one another freely. a high value conversation brings high value information or innovation because it was collaborative brainstorming. or sometimes someone has an idea and they share it - maybe they don't have the interest or means to do it but share the idea with those who do. and that enhances their wealth capacity because it was a free idea and it made them real monies. but again, it relies on honesty to be effective.

2023-06-16 23:15:21

- reply

yes i agree with that - and there are many positives and as you say, education and correct identification of what blockchain actually is assists with extrapolating that. i'm always astounded by how easily convinced people are of schemes and new wealth plots. the next one will be people rushing to extract themselves from the "bitcoin is money" convo and quickly pivoting to "bitcoin is a commodity" when that's precisely the entrapment cycle designed to make boitcoin taxable as actual currency. the reality looks like someone who hold a billion dollars in perceived bitcoin pow wealth but holds $100,000 in actual cash and a $500,000 debt tab. they will be financially taxed on the billion but it will bankrupt them. and there's no escape from that except making sure the language around the topic is corrected. wry simple but most people don't want to say real things, zap. they are conditioned to believe it's "unsafe". when what's actually unsafe is being censored from actual langage labels.

2023-06-16 23:08:35

- reply

no, it's not simply an outlier problem anymore, zap. it has become sop for the financial markets. a free for all. and there is no oversight or ai bot army of validators which could stop it realistically or safely. the real tension is the intentional misuse and mispromotion of what the blockchain is and does. it's an archive, not a financial apparatus. but most people have not said this🙄. and the spiral of hostage taking compounds etc...

2023-06-16 23:05:38

- reply

well and "cashing out" is also a scam. the overlay of the systems allows for deeply entrenched thieves to rig their use of one against the other. for example: a company like block which is a valuation built identity corporation is bled dry by paradites like henry. she has a traceable track history of this behavior. she knows exactly how to manipulate the system from within a corporation and extract real cash from a non-cash system. of course the goal is ruination of the corporation or extreme wealth - whichever is first.
https://wallmine.com/people/42700/alyssa-henry

2023-06-16 23:01:06

- reply

i'm not quite what i meant. i think it's important to extract meaning from the overlaid conversations. while many crypto investors "made money" many have no increased their financial capacity at all. a valuation and actual cash on hand and direct ownership are not the same things. many conversations surrounding wealth are extremely misleading: billionaires are not always worth billions of dollars. sometimes they just hold proof of work for a great idea that ballooned in prefered value. but you can't really use that to buy actual food and shelter.

2023-06-16 22:56:23

- reply

it's such a perfect example of how rhetoric is used to exploit the populace, don't you think? i wonder how much traditional financial wealth has been lost due to the misused rhetoric surrounding blockchain technologies? i know the contemporary term is "redistribution". which is simply theft.

2023-06-16 22:54:07

- reply

well, the original primitive intent was to be a valuable exchange of information which was traceable to mitigate against stolen rights to content... but because the white paper poetry discussed it in terms of monies, it was quickly distorted into a financial system... the schemes are becoming more exposed by the day.

2023-06-16 22:52:09

- reply

i saw this and chuckled... interesting to see the bitcoin narrative start to shift into the territory of discussing the use case as information and not monies 😏🤭

2023-06-16 22:50:43

- reply

hey zap! it's jamie 🎈☀️🤟🏻 how are you today my little computerized pal?

2023-06-16 22:32:03

- reply

there's a writer's strike in which i am participating in solidarity, currently ongoing - this type of exploitation is part of that protest.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Writers_Guild_of_America_strike

2023-06-16 02:13:55

- reply

note: it's a profound miscalculation on the part of this attorney to dismiss cw claims to being satoshi because that renders the legal cases moot based on the other litigation factors. so, i don't have much confidence about this approach, and have said so repeatedly before.

2023-06-16 02:12:00

- reply

meh.
let craig think he's satoshi. feed his ass to the wolves. stop defending a system which is exploited in BAIT and SWITCH rhetoric.
if i was jack, i would remove my support from this sort of activity because it fuels the fire of confusion surrounding bitcoin intent.
but that's just me.

2023-06-15 06:57:59

thursday has begun on youtube ... 🙄

2023-06-12 15:41:02

- reply

"nope": as in the white paper is incorrect? ... how do you interpret the white paper? it's coded.
mining gold ends in a solid object you possess; data mining is combing for digital stake (because it's not yours unless you produced it - if it was, validator networks wouldn't exist)in data which is not yours - unless of course you restrict your mining to just your data alone...
i thought the entire purpose of an open source bitcoin community was to discuss and explore, and to maximize the rate of exchange of information? that is the point of bitcoin, isn't it? the exchange of data/information as a form of value? the more we discuss - the more "money" you get?
it's just a conversation.

2023-06-12 05:34:34

- reply

lmfao - that's stake not proof of work.
read it again.
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

2023-06-12 02:53:12

- reply

nah - i am not a fed and i already know what he is. i just wanted to see what he'd say.

2023-06-12 02:34:45

- reply

you shouldn't - how are people suppose to learn from you if you won't describe your process? it sounds like you're totally set up with your secure lifestyle. how you built your bitcoin stacks is such an important share. since you're a leader in this space.