🅱🅻🆄🅴🅱️

I don't know. Trying not to be the problem.
I swear to resist information pollution.

Furry, IT, veteran (of course) 🦊
Python, data science, GIS

I stand on the shoulders of giants.

Last Notes

2025-12-11 18:22:55 GMT

- reply

Every AI tool being a butthole makes me look at this as a styalized pair of lips tonguing the prostate.

2025-11-22 00:44:44 GMT

- reply

I was looking for a wireless sex toy for my girlfriend, but this'll work.

2025-11-09 21:07:36 GMT

- reply

I don't agree with the layoff's as, if your people are being improved by a system, then that makes it more valuable to keep those people as they are more powerful. Not less valuable.
However, I also disagree with the other end of it as well. I remember what it was like to write SQL completely manually every time. I remember what it was like to write JavaScript completely manually every time. It sucked. I pretty much don't even need to write SQL anymore, I can just say, I want this data in this format and I get it. I can dump a slow query in and get a fast query out.
I do see a lot of people who try to use LLM's for things they can't do or in ways that don't produce results, but for me? I work like 10 times faster because of it.

2025-09-14 21:30:23 GMT

- reply

It's not about deserving, a lot of people deserve things, but what happens is what's convenient, What's useful, and what's cheap.
If it's hard to help and there is nothing to be gained people don't. At least in this current meta.
I think on a small scale people care, but we have very big engines that have been running for a long time that have chewed a lot of people and places up to a point where no small group can fix it.

2025-07-26 18:23:37 GMT

- reply

Dude I literally had to talk to an LLM to figure out what the just came out of your mouth. 😂
Okay, do you think we are screwing up turning websites into operating systems? It feels like we already had this with old school computing and we are once again reinventing the wheel, only now with 18 new layers of complexity under the hood.

2025-05-09 21:21:46 GMT

- reply

Slightly vague, but I think I get what you mean.
As in, you disagree with the material, but what good is voicing that disagreement? Other than perhaps speaking to yourself? Or am I misunderstanding?

2025-04-06 18:20:54 GMT

- reply

Don't engage. Just stay true.
Comments will try to destabilize you. Find the individuals who are trustworthy and ignore the rest.

2025-03-31 22:51:07 GMT

- reply

If you go on a podcast and that turn out to be dog doo doo, then you look bad too.
Someone who wants to discredit you could 100% put money down just to start something up, just to character assassinate a bunch of people they don't like. More likely, slimy people try to piggy back on your clout and end up dragging you down.
Be picky.

2025-03-29 05:29:05 GMT

- reply

It's another spat between people who use AI and people who don't.
It's dumb. Tools are tools, use what works, don't use what doesn't. Be careful about any dogma.
Short and sweet(after writing this, what a lie), 'AI' is a buzz word for a new kind of search. LLM's have their ups and downs just like traditional search types (exact match, semantic, regex) and Google search. The search can also be reversed to produce instead of search.
Which is causing trouble. So are scams being put into advertisement on Google and Facebook and every business, so were email scams, and so were phone scams. New tech, new attacks. Same old story.
AI is a bit dangerous as a tool because it's not local unlike most tools historically, which means it's nature could change. Though historically we have depended upon external systems like pip for Python, or GitHub, or mdm etc, or even phone infrastructure. Most of those won't all of a sudden change unless you install the update. But you do see rumblings of a trust breakdown with things like GitHub. Where people no longer trust that their private code is actually private. However, 'AI' (which is a terrible name for it) is very powerful and definitely has many use cases. Many of which have not been discovered yet.
Because 'AI' is built on data found everywhere and anywhere, and because in some cases it is polluting data sources (in some cases this is a huge problem), people are not happy, they feel, perhaps correctly that they have been stolen from. Simultaneously, most of us now have a new powerful search tool. It's a difficult moral landscape. Is vibe coding actually a thing that's super common? I don't know. I hear people use the term more often as an attack on AI. So my guess is that in reality, it is more a memetic dis on those who use AI.
Learning code will always be useful. To learn to code is to learn the structure of systems. Systems have some common truths about how they evolve, and attempting to build complex software teaches you about traps that systems run into that cause them to fail as they grow or age. Find a thing you want to do, and try to do it. Language models can help, and you can ask questions about the code itself. You won't always get the answer, but we still have other tools like traditional search, and books, and YouTube videos, etc. Use all of them.
Oh, and other people. People are still the most powerful source of information. Find smart people.

2025-02-02 01:27:29 GMT

- reply

Chatham asset management.
It's a hedge fund that has ties to the Republicans apparently.
That's a bombshell my dude.

2025-02-02 00:16:42 GMT

- reply

Do you know who is purchasing them?

2025-01-27 16:55:42 GMT

- reply

Why do people keep saying this.
Show me that thing performing as well as chat gpt.
I just don't see it.

2025-01-26 10:54:41 GMT

- reply

Yeah it's totally not poisoned or anything...
Very cutting edge 😂
https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/113/894/284/322/074/755/original/a2be5a2c39a28eb8.png
https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/113/894/284/394/104/517/original/9f8c3ac23af5c818.png

2024-11-23 19:40:27 GMT

- reply

Like finding a $50 in a suit pocket.