fabohax
HAX

for sure! those ideals are common sense for a vast amount of cryptographers as a matter of strong way to autonomy and individual freedom.
to study Cryptography can take years or months, and it requires high levels of passion.
Just someone/s highly commited to the cause can make it happen.

2024-09-22 18:53:01 GMT

- reply

sorry. i dont understand gringo humour. i wish to

2024-09-22 07:13:58 GMT

- reply

I agree with dis theory: It makes a lot of sense that Satoshi Nakamoto would be someone from the same circle as the cypherpunks, or at least very close to them. The cypherpunk movement was centered around using cryptography to push for privacy and freedom in the digital age—values that align perfectly with Bitcoin's ethos of decentralization, privacy, and financial freedom.
Many of the most credible Satoshi candidates, like Hal Finney, Nick Szabo, and Wei Dai, were part of or associated with the cypherpunk movement. These individuals were already working on ideas like digital cash, cryptography, and peer-to-peer networks, so Bitcoin feels like a natural evolution of the work they were doing in the 1990s and early 2000s.
The timing also aligns. Bitcoin emerged right when the cypherpunk philosophy started gaining traction, and the need for a decentralized financial system became clear after the 2008 financial crisis. The fact that Satoshi referenced cypherpunk ideas (like the b-money proposal from Wei Dai) in the Bitcoin whitepaper suggests they were closely tied to this community.
Ultimately, Bitcoin feels like a project that cypherpunks could have been working toward for years, so it seems very likely that Satoshi was someone deeply embedded in or influenced by that culture.

2024-09-22 07:10:34 GMT

- reply

Personally, I lean toward the idea that Satoshi Nakamoto is likely either an individual with an extensive cryptography and programming background, like Nick Szabo or Hal Finney, or a small group of individuals. The technical complexity of Bitcoin’s creation required expertise in cryptography, economics, and decentralized systems. Both Szabo and Finney had the necessary knowledge, and their contributions to early cryptographic projects closely resemble Bitcoin's structure.
The idea that Satoshi Nakamoto could be a group also makes sense because Bitcoin is an elegantly designed system that merges various fields—cryptography, peer-to-peer networking, and game theory. It’s plausible that different people contributed specialized expertise.
What strengthens this collective theory is how quickly and efficiently Bitcoin was developed. If one person truly did it alone, it would have required an enormous amount of knowledge and time. The fact that Satoshi disappeared and left others to continue the work also aligns with the behavior of a team, where the role of one key member might have become less necessary after the initial creation.
But at the end of the day, part of Bitcoin’s appeal is that it’s decentralized and leaderless. Keeping Satoshi’s identity anonymous helped solidify that ethos. So, whether it’s an individual or a group, the mystery is kind of the point.

2024-09-15 17:16:55 GMT

ders an autistic movie i always wanted to watch-again.

2024-09-15 02:39:22 GMT

- reply

dis is how it looks global nostr atm
#nevent1q…4cnm

2024-09-11 05:19:06 GMT

- reply

lol. bot love bombing?

2024-09-10 02:42:41 GMT

b a political nerd and watch netstates webinars monday nights
youtu.be/tNQixwdRfj4
esc

2024-08-24 03:10:37 GMT

to buy bitcoins doesnt drains u from ur classist imperialist bullshit.
sadly