BitcoinMonk
Bitcoin Monk

God bless bitcoin.

Public Key

npub1twg6ajypacxd209suhjwz9658dfk48j37u9mtyzh8lykaax6xt0s4wy42h

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9hydwezq7urx48jcwte8pza2rk5m2neglwza4jptnljtw7ndr9hcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsvdu93k

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1twg6ajypacxd209suhjwz9658dfk48j37u9mtyzh8lykaax6xt0s4wy42h

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-06-07 10:02:16 GMT

Who is running bip-110?

2026-06-07 09:31:42 GMT

I think @nprofile…fd7j finally flipped the bit.
Where are all the monetary maxis on nostr?
https://mempool.guide/block/0000000000000000000067a64c0b6cd29b686aee85c548c3970bd0f0029994c5

2026-01-06 20:45:46 GMT

People in the future will marvel that in the early years of bitcoin that we allowed 5 people to just decide what bitcoin is. And half of them didn't know the difference between a man and a woman.
People will look back on this time as one of the most morally depraved, inhumane and dangerous times in history.
They will look back on us like we lived in the dark ages.
We are cavemen who discovered lightning.
Meaning, besides the incredible advancements in technology, we are so early in the evolution of human governance and morality that what we tolerate today will become unheard of in the future.
I believe technology can actually play a huge role in this.
Either we adopt a sound money or governments will inflate away all the productivity and prosperity that would be achieved through AI and robotics.
Either we treat each other decently and leave each other alone or there will be endless wars.
Either we shrink governments or they will inevitably lead to tyrant after tyrant.
As the world goes so does bitcoin, or maybe vice versa.
Just maybe.
The solution is simple. Opt out. Buy what you need from friends and family with bitcoin and accept it as payment for your products/services.
Save your data on your own computer.
Shop locally.
Go to church.
Get married and start a family.
And have fun.
I think we would be ok if we all just did that and didn't worry about much else.

2026-01-04 19:45:17 GMT

- reply

It was youtube. Saw the link for it on x.

2026-01-03 16:48:57 GMT

- reply

Beautiful.

2026-01-03 07:46:50 GMT

Thanks to @nprofile…w2ua for the constant reminder to try to see the world in a new light and to @nprofile…8xhx for putting out an excellent podcast with him. What a great way to start the year and I wish you both a fantastic 2026.
This podcast is what inspired my new years resolution to move to a bitcoin standard. Wish me luck.
I'll see you in the future.
-monk

2025-11-29 07:38:46 GMT

- reply

You are correct sir,
How about 1 satoshi? I understand the math but what do you think you could buy with one sat?

2025-11-29 07:33:38 GMT

https://blossom.primal.net/474ddc39ef4a9e29ef2622f7b66bae0eb8d193c3cbb901cd43ccbee649e4b313.png

2025-11-29 03:45:56 GMT

- reply

Who built @npub1hal…60zq?
That is so cool!
#nevent1q…m3lc

2025-11-29 03:42:37 GMT

“Which way does a tree fall?
A tree falls the way it leans.”
- The Lorax

2025-11-28 23:39:00 GMT

How much is one is one bitcoin worth if you couldn’t denominate it in fiat currency.

2025-11-26 15:58:13 GMT

- reply

It was an honor and a pleasure working with the legends over at Stackchain Magazine!
Thank you guys!
#nevent1q…ssls

2025-11-25 15:37:34 GMT

Anyone who claims fees are the only filter that works please tell me how this is wrong.
"Why not let the fee market manage data storage?
The fee market is designed to prioritize transactions based on economic urgency.
However, the market for data storage on the blockchain is a completely different market from the market for payments, with completely different incentives.
Specifically, the fee for a monetary transaction incentivizes a miner to include the transaction in a block, representing a one-time transfer of monetary value, i.e., a payment. The miner thus provides the one-time service of securing a payment, for a one-time fee.
Once the payment is secured, the payor does not receive any additional benefit from the Bitcoin network, besides the integrity of Bitcoin's transaction history (a service to which all node operators are happy to contribute, because Bitcoin would not function as money otherwise).
Conversely, the fee for a data storage transaction still goes only to the miner who includes the data in a block, but the burden of storing the data falls on all node operators, who never received even a part of the fee, yet are forced to continue downloading, storing, and serving the data forever.
In this case, the miner accepts a one-time fee, and in exchange, the priceless service of highly-available, uncensorable data storage is provided in perpetuity for free by node operators.
The problem becomes even worse when the data is objectionable to node operators, as this represents an even larger, unexpected cost for them."
This is an excerpt from the Reduced Data Temporary Soft Fork.

2025-10-26 20:03:57 GMT

- reply

You are right about one thing. Bitcoin is what we make it.
What you are missing is that this is not only a technical discussion. Filling up nodes with garbage creates a disincentive to run a node.
What incentive do I have to relay and mine transactions full of garbage.
We signed up for money not jpegs. And defending my private property is not censorship, deal with it.

2025-10-26 11:28:40 GMT

I would support this. How about you?
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/3c718237072c107ced8c3531a487354fbdae55df/bip-%3F%3F%3F%3F.mediawiki

2025-10-25 02:41:48 GMT

- reply

Exactly!

2025-10-25 02:32:52 GMT

- reply

That was an excellent interview. Thanks for doing what you do and trying to keep your cool.

2025-10-25 02:17:04 GMT

- reply

I don’t care what happens to your filthy transactions. If your transactions have a problem being censored than make better transactions. I will never have this problem because I am not imposing a bunch of garbage on my peers. I respect their private property and will use as little of their resources as humanly possible. If you don’t also do that it’s your problem, not mine.

2025-10-21 03:28:36 GMT

- reply

Did you read mine? I never said that i can make anyone do anything. But people claim knots is censorship all the time which is obviously not true.
No one has made a single good case supporting that claim, including you.

2025-10-20 13:10:19 GMT

- reply

No one should be forced to relay and store a bunch of data that has nothing to do with bitcoin if they don't want to.
Give me one reason I should.

2025-10-20 13:06:02 GMT

- reply

What incentive do I have to relay and store csam or jpegs?
If you can't give me a reason then you're wrong.

2025-10-20 13:04:02 GMT

- reply

What does that even mean?

2025-10-19 02:41:47 GMT

This big beautiful consolidation transaction has been in my mempool for the last six blocks and was actually rejected by Foundry USA 3 times, viaBTC, and Binance in favor of a bunch of garbage spam. This is where core 30 is taking us. Core nodes now favor bloating the utxo set over shrinking it.
My knotty node has been trying to mine this transaction the entire time but it was displaced by spam that core 30 is optimized for. Why is core software rejecting valid transactions that are actually beneficial to the blockchain in favor of flooding the blockchain with bullshit dust transactions.
This transaction was eventually mined by F2Pool and turned 1000 utxos into 1. Why are we optimizing bitcoin to be free data storage service for miscreants instead of prioritizing transactions that clean up that junk. I'm sure this is just some scammer preparing another mint of dick butts on the chain but it still begs the question. Why is it easier to spam the chain than clean it up. Seems like the incentives are perverse.
https://blossom.primal.net/a75efc2e98aeb3739770949f22877f34a0e8ff99aec91db269f398b4a961be41.png
https://blossom.primal.net/10763f860f6fe520a07500cadcf2435d06de8045ad91e24e2f6d42b1b05f6ca2.png
https://blossom.primal.net/87aeeded0a3cd8c6da7126fb9087c2c7793746c22d66be1885dfa5671b530ef4.png
https://blossom.primal.net/67632aeb1eebf9d26926f55a109a81293ec7d4e1352ca1f8be48c6fa7182eb25.png
https://blossom.primal.net/7ad6f5e71dd9c3b9eaca89ab0644ffdd536acd377961cdcc8d93d95721c802c4.png
https://blossom.primal.net/fe98b928df261267792738653cb87c1e11dbcee3b5c2429fb39a5f6707f00f7c.png
https://blossom.primal.net/5b2bfd8882ec66d45c98d460f94cf8edbaa38b2723e0b60bee631d26f4cfc782.png

2025-10-18 14:34:42 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/2db557fac798ff75719f75ba1b3968f63cfcec5bf5d25157fb0ec9306e5a58b5.png

2025-10-18 14:29:32 GMT

- reply

That's awesome.

2025-10-18 14:27:08 GMT

https://blossom.primal.net/ee8c002dce24084fa59373ea469462f0ed48f9fda88de0bdc79926ac529e1111.jpg

2025-10-18 14:25:03 GMT

- reply

Yes!
https://blossom.primal.net/ce308e168d553f4c62f62955a34f2378053581729fbbabec3df35bc04a33c942.png

2025-10-18 14:23:42 GMT

- reply

Yes! 🤣

2025-10-18 14:21:39 GMT

- reply

I'm borrowing your profile image, thanks!!

2025-10-18 14:20:34 GMT

- reply

Bang on!

2025-10-18 14:19:22 GMT

- reply

No. Setting my own mempool policy is not censorship at all.
Don't know about you, but I have the freedom of speech. I'm allowed to say whatever I want. Censorship is preventing people from speaking.
Isn't it more like tyranny when the dominant implementation makes changes that will force you to do something against your will. In fact this is the type of thing bitcoiners should be fighting against. A single organization dictating what my mempool should look like.
Absolutely insane.

2025-10-16 15:18:07 GMT

- reply

What!!! I can't watch this yet but there is no way.
On the other hand. I would support a fork to limit spam.

2025-10-10 16:12:29 GMT

- reply

Thanks @npub18ap…z9wl

2025-10-10 16:10:16 GMT

Find a woman that will do this for you on a regular basis and you will be happy.
Oh and have as many babies ass humanly possible.
https://blossom.primal.net/d8ec823e1ef1a99d8e7cea87ceb7a4f5a30f46bf51871292c69d26b66ddccd0d.jpg

2025-10-09 13:49:42 GMT

Are you going to update to core v30?
If so, why are you willing to assume potential the legal liability of relaying illicit content?
How can you guarantee that there is no risk, have you consulted a lawyer?
What incentive do you have to relay that garbage?
Why are you willing to support a change that discourages running a full archival node?
Why do you think you are smarter than 21% of the entire network?
I'll running knots even if it is totally ineffective, which it isn't, because it is the morally superior option.

2025-10-09 13:21:18 GMT

- reply

⚡️🚨 ALERT - Hamas STILL holds hostages from over TWO years ago!!!

2025-10-09 13:19:52 GMT

- reply

🤣

2025-10-09 13:17:57 GMT

- reply

Why does Jack Dorsey call him bitcoins guardian angel if he hasn't saved bitcoin multiple times?

2025-10-09 01:51:13 GMT

- reply

Haha, I think you’re right.

2025-10-09 00:27:19 GMT

- reply

I'll probably get torched for this but who cares.
Maybe they shouldn't have picked a fight with Isreal if they couldn't defend themselves.

2025-10-09 00:23:23 GMT

If this doesn't make you want to run as far as you possibly can away from core were doomed.
https://blossom.primal.net/5393265b1d0887f22cd69e83f28c0cc1fe9e86f1ec5cf171f392e2e8491adf51.png

2025-10-09 00:19:17 GMT

- reply

You didn't answer my question but I'll still enlighten you.
I decide.
I decide what a better pool is.
I decide what a good pool is.
I decide what gets filtered.
Do you see how that is the complete opposite of a centralized blacklist?

2025-10-08 03:25:14 GMT

- reply

Luke tried that more than a year ago and core rejected it as ‘too controversial’

2025-10-08 03:15:30 GMT

- reply

*say

2025-10-08 03:14:17 GMT

- reply

Haha. I saw uh-MAL(like Hal)-gum

2025-10-08 03:06:42 GMT

- reply

So warning people something bad is happening and telling them they should choose a better pool or make their own blocks is fear mongering and censorship?
Did you come up with that yourself or did you borrow that from core.

2025-10-07 18:43:06 GMT

- reply

What's the difference.

2025-10-07 17:10:23 GMT

- reply

Excellent question. I haven't seen a good answer either.

2025-10-07 03:02:22 GMT

- reply

There is also economic incentives to not facilitate the degradation of the very thing that makes you money.
You should look into the ‘free market demand’ for red hair.

2025-10-07 03:00:07 GMT

Can someone please explain how setting my own mempool policy on my node is censorship?
Not a single person has been able to do so.

2025-10-07 02:59:56 GMT

- reply

This is one of my favorites!
#nevent1q…25yg

2025-10-05 19:45:38 GMT

- reply

Actually, I would love to. How can I buys some?

2025-10-05 17:24:42 GMT

- reply

I can confirm! Ghee is amazing!
We used to have a dairy in my community and I milked the cows a few days a week. Sometimes there was more milk than we know what to do with so we would make yoghurt or ice cream and one time we made ghee. It was so much work but tasted like heaven. It didn’t last us nearly as long as I had hoped, we put it on everything.

2025-10-05 16:34:51 GMT

- reply

Are you claiming that if I am a miner i am ‘censoring’ you if I don’t mine your transactions?

2025-10-05 16:32:51 GMT

- reply

I assume he is mistakenly referring to knots users. Correct me if I’m wrong.

2025-10-05 15:37:16 GMT

- reply

I won't argue that.
It has a technical aspect but my point is that the two camps are basing their arguments on entirely different perceptions of reality so what it is really about is the culture. We have moved beyond technical arguments because core can't even define spam and rejects that it is even possible to define.
The battle now is who's definition of what bitcoin is is correct?

2025-10-05 15:32:55 GMT

Distributed authoritarianism is what makes bitcoin valuable, change my mind.

2025-10-05 14:54:51 GMT

- reply

I don't know if Gloria is on nostr but she should respond to this video. @nprofile…zyc0 said he would retract his statements if they are incorrect. If you want to hear a response please share this video.
#nevent1q…8rjk

2025-10-05 04:39:59 GMT

- reply

This is encouraging to see.
#nevent1q…d8ar

2025-10-04 04:59:27 GMT

The op_return issue is not a technical debate, change my mind.

2025-10-04 04:58:04 GMT

https://blossom.primal.net/4669c72353f02707d5df27cc668ae32514d675d5cc52688bcf284f04d72298e2.png
This one is for the "technical" side of the op return issue.

2025-10-03 16:19:37 GMT

- reply

Excellent article.

2025-10-03 01:13:08 GMT

- reply

Exactamundo.

2025-10-02 13:10:10 GMT

- reply

Today it's op_return.
Tomorrow it will be the max transaction size.
The day after it will be the block size.
The next day it will be 21 million.
It's your choice to go down that path or knot.
#nevent1q…aecd

2025-10-02 01:13:14 GMT

- reply

Woo hoooo!

2025-10-01 17:15:47 GMT

- reply

Does that mean what I think it means??? That's huge!!!!
Time to start an LLC and create a bitcoin treasury for it asap.

2025-09-30 17:04:04 GMT

- reply

He looks lonely. Where are all his freinds?

2025-09-30 16:59:56 GMT

- reply

In case you don’t want to go to x here is the post.
https://blossom.primal.net/1619ecff16acd817c4172282735ffcdf4cdd5a7d5f529b11ecbe283e2505b08b.png
#nevent1q…yuvs

2025-09-30 16:57:59 GMT

This was the argument used to reject @nprofile…zu3c's pr to fix datacarrier size to apply to new methods of carrying data.
Now, despite 21% of the network rebelling, they say 'It would set a bad precedent if we let controversy direct development.'
Make it make sense
https://x.com/achow101/status/1735310357386731533?s=46

2025-09-30 14:45:14 GMT

- reply

Some people don't know who this so I wanted to clarify.
This is Gloria Zhao. She is one of the only people on the planet that has merge rights to bitcoin cores code base.
That means when you tell her that bitcoin is money and should not be flooded with jpegs and shitcoins she can just ignore you and make changes to bitcoin that make spam easier.
There is not a single dev working on bitcoin core that can define spam. This is why they can say 'filters don't work'. That is only partly true because they have never tried filtering the obvious exploits of bitcoins protocol.
The real change to bitcoin isn't op return, its that there is no longer a single 'maintainer' at bitcoin core that has the moral fortitude to acknowledge that spam is not helpful and to do something about it.
#nevent1q…9wch #nevent1q…9wch

2025-09-30 14:36:03 GMT

- reply

Not only a core dev. She is one of the only people on the planet that has merge rights to the bitcoin core repo.

2025-09-30 14:34:47 GMT

- reply

That is a shitcoiner.

2025-09-30 07:04:17 GMT

A question often raised is "What threshold does knots need to reach to even be effective?"
All it would take is 8 nodes in particular to make it virtually impossible to get spam in the chain. Why are we even talking to coretards, we should be talking to those 8 nodes that control 90% of the hashrate
8 nodes

2025-09-30 06:47:33 GMT

Good guys want to put as little data on chain as possible.
Bad guys want to put as much data on chain as possible.
It's really that simple.

2025-09-30 06:39:55 GMT

Did you know the dust limit is just another filter. Why doesn't Core get rid of that one too. It's just mempool policy. That's totally useless right and probably never had a purpose anyway. Just get rid of all of it while your at it.

2025-09-30 01:11:20 GMT

- reply

What do you mean by that?

2025-09-29 15:05:05 GMT

- reply

Today’s pleb will be the new wars OG.

2025-09-29 13:34:31 GMT

You're free to transact how you want.
Nodes are free to relay what they want.
Nodes are free to run whatever software they want.
Miners are free to mine what they want.
You are free run a node and mine if you want.
That's why knots is not censoring transactions.
That's why bitcoin is censorship resistant.
You CAN NOT force anyone else to relay or mine something they don't want to.
Knots simply has stricter default mempool policy which users like.
Anyone making claims that knots = censorship either doesn't understand bitcoin and should be ignored or are lying to you and should be ignored.
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.

2025-09-29 13:22:25 GMT

- reply

You're kidding me. They voted to enslave themselves.

2025-09-29 13:19:56 GMT

- reply

What an image.

2025-09-28 18:12:20 GMT

- reply

Why would any one in their right mind pay more in fees when they could just filter out those transactions?

2025-09-28 17:40:48 GMT

- reply

I would agree that spammers are indeed some of the most disgusting people on the planet. That is why I am highlighting their disgusting behavior.

2025-09-28 17:39:38 GMT

- reply

You make no sense.

2025-09-28 17:38:44 GMT

- reply

2025-09-28 17:38:22 GMT

- reply

Love it!

2025-09-28 17:17:46 GMT

- reply

If you are storing ‘your work’ on chain you are likely a spammer.

2025-09-28 17:16:06 GMT

- reply

What does that mean?

2025-09-28 17:12:03 GMT

A little gem I found on twitter from @npub1t4h…9w0u
https://blossom.primal.net/f8a0d14b75e9716ae006934e069847963637eabed67ecc9c190461e88226d490.jpg

2025-09-28 16:47:31 GMT

- reply

Spammers get paid to make transactions. Monetary users seek the lowest fee. The incentives don’t work.
Why would any one in their right mind pay more in fees when they could just filter out those transactions?

2025-09-28 15:50:28 GMT

- reply

This is the truth.

2025-09-28 15:12:09 GMT

- reply

Not even going to lie, that made me tear up.

2025-09-28 14:55:10 GMT

- reply

Total bull. Here's what actually happened.
Filters work just fine. Claiming that fee are the only filter ignores all of bitcoins history.
2023 a few new methods of spam were discovered.
Luke made a pr to filter that crap and core just refused to adopt them. This is the dramatic shift in the development process.
It's not that filters became less effective, it's that for some reason bitcoin core just decided to stop using them. This is why the name calling and the claims of shitcoining, because there is no other logical conclusion for why all of the sudden we were just going to let literal attacks go unchallenged. That is not hyperbole, these spammers has said publicly that their goal is to ruin bitcoin and make it unusable.
There is no reason to force monetary use cases to compete with spam in the fee market. This completely distorts the incentive structure. Spammers stand to make money from their transactions where a monetary transaction only looses money to fees. This premise that you should be willing to pay more than spam for block space or you don't really care about bitcoin is false.
The use cases and therefore incentives are completely incompatible. A monetary network wants fees to be as low as possible, that's one of the reasons we invented lightning. Spammers are willing pay extraordinary fees because they are selling satoshis for more than they are worth. Spammer get paid to make transactions! How can some mom and pop shop or normal user compete with that?
Now fast forward to today, people like Calle are parading around pretending that filters just stopped working when in reality we just stopped using them.
When used filters work incredibly well. The cat and mouse game is absolutely worth playing because the ones using the protocol for its intended purpose have the advantage. Notice there are not a million new ways of spamming bitcoin, there are just a couple that can be easily filtered. You do not have to update every day, that is a wildly ridiculous claim. In the real world developing these schemes to sneak data into bitcoin take time to develop but only minutes to filter. Luke demonstrated this at btc++.
When scammy projects see that they will spend tons of resources to develop their product only to get filtered out, they will just stop trying. If for some reason they can just keep burning money spamming bitcoin and creating new protocols to do so, they are probably just connected to the money printer.
This is not 'the price of decentralization', it is an obvious attack and cores lack of action while the utxo set tripped and the block chain was flooded with jpegs should raise major red flags.
If it wasn't clear let me reiterate. YES, knots filters most spam already. The reason it doesn't do much is because 98% of the network, until recently, refused to do anything about it. Since 2023, when the majority of this nonsense started, there has been a decisive change in the priorities of the project.
This shift in attitude is the big change that we should all be extremely concerned about. The change to op return and standard fees are just going to make it easier to spam the chain and are a direct result of this change in attitude. If we allow this they just move on to the next filter they want to rip out and bitcoin will slowly turn into ethereum.
Is that what you want anon?

2025-09-28 06:21:33 GMT

Everyone should watch this. This guy just said he thinks we should be able to build an UNDO BUTTON ON BITCOIN TXS. Did I hear that right??? min 3:23
Shitcoin Magazine propagandists are out in full force. I could not believe my ears. The attitude towards bitcoin displayed in this video is exactly what makes monetary maximalists want to ossify. This was at a conference that took place a few weeks ago.
He asks if can bitcoin succeed without another fork. These guys are going around Asia, where a ton of the mining happens, saying we need to fork bitcoin and we need to do it now before it's too late and bitcoin ossifies. I'm paraphrasing but that is not much of an exaggeration. These are all the same people that support core v30 and are pretending that Luke is the one who wants to fork.
Remember all those times when @nprofile…d7ya was right, when everyone said he was wrong, and he saved bitcoin. This battle over op return could be another one of those times.
This guy spent 15 minutes essentially advocating for accommodating layer two capabilities on bitcoin by way of a soft fork. They want to add things like CTV and OP_CAT, OP_THIS and OP_THAT all for the sake of 'building better layer two applications'. He even makes wildly unfounded claims that users will move away from custodial solutions and centralized exchanges in favor of the L2 apps they want to build. That all sounds fine and dandy until you realize that he refused to even mention the lightning network more than a single time and only to say about it that 'we haven't seen acceleration in that regard'.
Why is it that all the people that want to change bitcoin so badly refuse to talk about, or work on, the lightning network. Has lightning failed? Should we just get rid of segwit and taproot since they were such flops? Or will there never be an end to the changes you want to make to bitcoin until the code becomes so convoluted and complex that we just become ethereum 2.0?
What you guys don't seem to understand is that not long ago we did fork just to make lightning possible which makes bitcoin incredibly easy to use. Just use that.
Your fancy L2 is not going to magically increase adoption. It''s going to be changes to the law and tax code that will bring mass adoption. Have you ever tried to buy something in your local community from someone who has never even heard of bitcoin? It's not easy.
I think Luke, @nprofile…fkft , and bitcoin knots is absolutely on the right side of history here because they are the ones advocating that WE SHOULD NOT CHANGE BITCOIN with so little agreement in the community. That is the ultimate irony of this war, the ones that cant wait to be done talking about op return so that they can move on to the next fork as soon as possible are also the ones that have been telling knots users to fork off the whole time and now are writing hit pieces attacking Luke trying to say he wants to fork bitcoin. You can't make this up.
I know this is a very convoluted and messy battle but your default behaviour when you are not sure what is going on should be to just sit on your hands. DON'T DO ANYTHING. Whatever you do, DON'T UPDATE TO CORE V30. If you want send the message that bitcoinres think its bad to have spam on a monetary network and something should be done about it instead of making it easier to do then run knots.
I don't know what more to say. How can you possibly trust core anymore.
Core has been deprecated just like they did to op_return. It is a centralized privately funded organization that has proven to be untrustworthy. Bitcoiners should abandon them immediately or at a bare minimum just don't upgrade.
Please show me where I'm wrong. I would love to know.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGrRMT40NI0

2025-09-28 00:24:44 GMT

- reply

Hell yes!

2025-09-27 21:51:16 GMT

- reply

What do you use.

2025-09-27 21:46:19 GMT

- reply

My man! That is absolutely the truth. I use a weight belt instead. But what really makes you look like a super is when you unlock a slow muscle up.
If you can do sets of weighted pull ups then you already have the strength but maybe need to work on technique. High pull ups are the first step. Make that bar touch your nipples then keep going!

2025-09-27 16:27:43 GMT

- reply

Haha, I finally made it into a video!
Seriously, I'm so glad that you shared that comment from Luke. It was actually in response to discussion started from a poll that I made about hard forks. That poll was made right before The Rag put out their smear job and I was very hesitant to post that but as you can see in my comment below his, it was totally worth it.
Thanks for finding that gem and sharing it with more people. I just feel like this is one of those times you have to say "The Lord works in mysterious ways!"

2025-09-27 16:00:45 GMT

- reply

I think your right

2025-09-27 15:40:20 GMT

- reply

Hey, I just learned primal is more centralized. What is a good client, besides damus? I had a run in on twitter with the damus guy and found out he supports core so I refuse to support his work. Is that childish? Maybe. Don't care though.
What client do you like?

2025-09-27 15:37:44 GMT

- reply

Satoshi on spam.
#nevent1q…sp4e