NoDoxGregBrady

https://nicecrew.digital/users/NoDoxGregBrady

Public Key

npub1ujk6s5eahcy22ps2ev9yv34s0dk22r7yqhr7p50ddgx7vwdqgc3s6xluw9

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqswftdg2v7muz99qc9vkzjxg6c8km99plzqt3lq68kk5r0x8xsyvgcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshzvj49

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1ujk6s5eahcy22ps2ev9yv34s0dk22r7yqhr7p50ddgx7vwdqgc3s6xluw9

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-09-09 13:20:36 GMT

- reply

#Would.

2026-09-08 15:23:35 GMT

- reply

That, sir, is a graph showing a line going up over the last single year. It contains no other data.
It definitely does not show "U.S. Birth Rate From 1965-1985".

2026-09-08 15:20:41 GMT

- reply

>@grok please create a graph displaying animosity towards ai datacenters over time

2026-09-08 15:17:55 GMT

- reply

>to suggests that having fewer kids than a generation in which births "BOOMED" is inherently insufficient is either stupid or dishonest
The. Birthrate. Collapsed.

2026-09-08 15:14:13 GMT

- reply

>by your "logic" (emotion), the corporate standard of "number must always go up" is sensible.
You just proved my assertion. Maintaining the population would have produced a flat line. Not up, not down: flat.
Why are you arguing that the population did not collapse?

2026-09-08 15:07:28 GMT

- reply

>it's just crybaby shit lol LOSER
We're currently living through an active civilizational collapse. We can all see it (except I guess you). Things have gotten progressively worse for six straight decades.
I cannot believe that you are too stupid to understand that "maintaining the current population" looks different from "declining population", and have to assume you're not arguing in good faith.

2026-09-08 15:04:18 GMT

- reply

Is he in competition with Mexicans for manual labor? Or with jeets for technical corporate jobs? Or with niggers for welfare scraps? How many jobs do you think are out there? The nation is bankrupt; do you imagine that things will just magically go on forever?

2026-09-08 15:01:42 GMT

- reply

They did not have "plenty". The average boomer put off having kids until the woman was 30; they were the first to use birth control; they were the first to use wide-spread legal in-vitro child-sacrifice.
If they had done nothing more than maintain, during the easiest, wealthiest, most luxurious, least hungry period of time in all of human history, we would see that graph showing a flat line.
Line go down.

2026-09-08 14:54:20 GMT

- reply

The boomers did NOT have shit tons of kids. The very first thing they ever failed at in life was having children. There was a reason Elementary Schools were closing all across the nation through the 1970's, and it was because there weren't enough children to warrant keeping them open.
https://cdn.nicecrew.digital/25/7a/5d/257a5db59af2a4f866f1c28f51973dfbc7c9f922df41e29e89204af65c26b0c9.png

2026-09-08 12:38:55 GMT

- reply

I have personally listened to boomers explain why this is a Good Thing.