Steve Vladeck

https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/stevevladeck.bsky.social

@ksvesq.[bsky.social](http://bsky.social )’s husband; father of daughters; professor @georgetownlaw.[bsky.social](http://bsky.social ); #SCOTUS nerd @CNN.com

Bio: [law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephe...](http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck )

"One First" Supreme Court newsletter: [stevevladeck.com](http://stevevladeck.com )

Book: [tinyurl.com/shadowdocketpb](http://tinyurl.com/shadowdocketpb )

🌉 [bridged](https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/stevevladeck.bsky.social ) from 🦋 [stevevladeck.bsky.social](https://bsky.app/profile/stevevladeck.bsky.social ), follow Bridgy Fed for Bluesky (npub1pqr…2sck) to interact

Web site: https://bsky.app/profile/stevevladeck.bsky.social
Link: http://bsky.social
Link: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck
Link: http://stevevladeck.com
Link: http://tinyurl.com/shadowdocketpb

Public Key

npub1w2ss4l7ndfkvmyetvsv3khww94chjttscchyfzq2uh0mgxvp5gmsgyn2vr

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs89gg2llfk5mxdjv4kgxgmth8z6ute94cvvtjy3q9wtha5rxq6ydcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmntl550jp

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

Author Public Key

npub1w2ss4l7ndfkvmyetvsv3khww94chjttscchyfzq2uh0mgxvp5gmsgyn2vr

Show more details

Published at

2026-05-30T23:28:04Z

Kind type

0 Metadata

Event JSON

{ "id": "75aae77345c04648afb7dbcf3f4fb2e3f64ab6c63d706688788d32a1dd863cf8", "pubkey": "72a10affd36a6ccd932b64191b5dce2d71792d70c62e44880ae5dfb41981a237", "created_at": 1780183684, "kind": 0, "tags": [ [ "proxy", "https://bsky.brid.gy/ap/did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv", "activitypub" ], [ "L", "pink.momostr" ], [ "l", "pink.momostr.activitypub:https://bsky.brid.gy/ap/did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv", "pink.momostr" ], [ "-" ] ], "content": "{\"name\":\"Steve Vladeck\",\"about\":\"@ksvesq.[bsky.social](http://bsky.social )’s husband; father of daughters; professor @georgetownlaw.[bsky.social](http://bsky.social ); #SCOTUS nerd @CNN.com\\n\\nBio: [law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephe...](http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck )\\n\\n\\\"One First\\\" Supreme Court newsletter: [stevevladeck.com](http://stevevladeck.com )\\n\\nBook: [tinyurl.com/shadowdocketpb](http://tinyurl.com/shadowdocketpb )\\n\\n🌉 [bridged](https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/stevevladeck.bsky.social ) from 🦋 [stevevladeck.bsky.social](https://bsky.app/profile/stevevladeck.bsky.social ), follow nostr:npub1pqr3g2gk3vsnrqk9kwfqqcxc6d5cwjr0hyc0nlzz9py5nf92vd9sn02sck to interact\\n\\nWeb site: https://bsky.app/profile/stevevladeck.bsky.social\\nLink: http://bsky.social\\nLink: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck\\nLink: http://stevevladeck.com\\nLink: http://tinyurl.com/shadowdocketpb\\n\",\"website\":\"https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/stevevladeck.bsky.social\",\"picture\":\"https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv\u0026cid=bafkreibz352zp56r7nlbab5n7mcanhqdjq6r7xc6pbv2ehkd2mmqhy4f5m\",\"banner\":\"https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv\u0026cid=bafkreiatohtwiah4wu3zjmdec4kuufairdn7qvnqzse65jxxn74jzw77ai\",\"nip05\":\"[email protected]\"}", "sig": "d4961818ed453f50517eb9a88e403d443611eb4e555f0ae84feafef43e4338dcbfc8c5509b8b8f78d4d9f33ccb713dd19aafb4a7ec66c88bdad3da1b9b1cd699" }

Last Notes

2026-05-04 15:14:20 GMT

One of the most amusingly petty things Justice Alito does is to put deadlines on administrative stays *only* when he is deeply *unsympathetic* to the applicants.
He did it in the 2023 mife case and the 2024 SB4 immigration case; and he did it today.
In all other cases, his stays are indefinite:
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreicerkd4inm6lscptxr6c4fmfsp7fihyzfj2fk26njvnmbum6xencu
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreifxrnxseswiinnuzik5u2pmj5qyfbrfmwlomxk42pn5iiaezp6tue
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreih7pvx35ccubkn74b734jojhnvprd3uonzjb6ui4gqwef5lgblkki
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreigi5e5cxw6ytj2wxjoivwe6lgjqioqgaakkaqhqeibuljgzfcbosy

2026-04-29 14:15:50 GMT

"I dissent because Congress elected otherwise. I dissent because the Court betrays its duty to faithfully implement the great statute Congress wrote. I dissent because the Court’s decision will set back the foundational right Congress granted of racial equality in electoral opportunity. I dissent."
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv/post/3mknborr7lc2w
#note1gkm…uaqy

2026-03-02 23:05:11 GMT

#SCOTUS just granted emergency relief in *both* the California teachers case (putting back on hold, at least in this case, California’s law barring teachers from outing transgender students to their parents) *and* the Malliotakis redistricting cases.
The Democratic appointees dissented in both.

2026-02-28 12:03:10 GMT

“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it.”
— Martin Luther King, Jr.

2026-02-03 01:06:19 GMT

Even if you don't have time to read all 83 pages of Judge Reyes's opinion barring the Trump administration from rescinding Temporary Protected Status for 350,000+ Haitians, please at least check out the four-page introduction.
It's a tour de force:
[storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.283214/gov.uscourts.dcd.283214.124.0_1.pdf )
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreicrroq5taft777rmau2ffjlsphbcatlxnwwigf2yekoke533yycim
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreicvxsij5lz3c4bvi5demq2xeggbfgxbics5bjmy7m253tfptwomdi
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreid3cmawech25ummuj2tjvgxsrvufma2kmrijlfpglalwddd3qkikq
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreidbz4eb6u5lca3ophhzuhpoejqajkqg3xq63vdaiz5sfi2asfwp54

2026-01-28 13:41:23 GMT

In Printz v. United States, #SCOTUS held that the Constitution bars the federal government from forcing or otherwise compelling local or state governments to enforce federal law.
The liberal squish who wrote the majority opinion in that case? Justice Antonin Scalia:
[tile.loc.gov/storage-serv...](https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep521/usrep521898/usrep521898.pdf )
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreigklwtzoj63srjgujs67uyvgabbo2rp52b6vjk7qsaaxvpj6s44we

2026-01-26 02:00:47 GMT

This morning, I recorded a video on TikTok about why DHS’s arguments for the power to enter homes without judicial warrants in immigration cases are bunk.
Nine hours later, TikTok still says my video is “under review,” and can’t be shared.
Well, here’s a link:
[georgetown.box.com/v/Vladeck-IC...](https://georgetown.box.com/v/Vladeck-ICE-4A )
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreih362ezm3eliu5ayzx4c4rldqvp7vsqvcnezp5xk4thmzswczlbym

2026-01-24 16:25:11 GMT

You did not bear the shame.
You resisted.
You bestowed the eternally vigilant symbol of change by sacrificing your impassioned lives for freedom, justice and honour.
— The German Resistance Memorial in Berlin
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreielhxavkctdjyiygyrmxoh2zql2w6uhqo5zug2sydalnetpvzpdoe

2026-01-22 12:32:20 GMT

“DOJ’s ‘Notice of Corrections’ ought to give the justices real pause … about substituting their judgment for that of district courts at least where preliminary relief has been based upon an impoverished (or non-existant) record.”
Today’s “One First” on developments in the DOGE/Social Security case:
[Bonus 203: Correcting the Reco...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-203-correcting-the-record-in )

2026-01-18 14:22:47 GMT

Ah yes, the new, “free markets and liberties”-focused Washington Post:
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreietlp4q6nqacmo3mvi6rgho4ubwgxr6r4j3mrphxnjurw6cpiik3e

2026-01-17 02:07:42 GMT

Folks are about to learn a lot about the Eighth Circuit (the federal appeals court the jurisdiction of which includes Minnesota).
It has 11 active judges; 10 appointed by Republican presidents (including four by Trump). And the one senior judge still hearing cases is also a Republican appointee.

2026-01-12 22:56:09 GMT

It would take a two-word amendment to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to subject ICE agents and other federal law enforcement officers to the same liability for constitutional violations that local and state officers currently face.
If Congress actually cared about what it's seeing, it could pass that overnight.

2025-11-22 01:39:19 GMT

If you had told me Mamdani and MTG would both be in the news today, and gave me eleventy thousand guesses as to why, I’d … still be guessing.

2025-11-22 00:42:44 GMT

#BREAKING: Just hours after Texas asked #SCOTUS to pause Tuesday’s ruling that had blocked its new House congressional district maps, Justice Alito has issued a temporary “administrative” stay pausing that ruling (and putting the new maps back into place) while the full Court considers next steps:
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreicgytldjpxulbftwg2x5v27abivj3darx6ctqxmpoib2gkszusmqm

2025-11-18 00:52:22 GMT

The Federalist Society has apparently taken down the video of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche's "Fireside Chat" at the National Lawyers Convention on November 7 (the one where he said that he and the Justice Department are at "war" against federal district courts):
I wonder why...
[2025 National Lawyers Conventi...](https://fedsoc.org/conferences/2025-national-lawyers-convention#agenda-item-fireside-chat-6 )

2025-11-11 23:07:54 GMT

#BREAKING: Over a public dissent from Justice Jackson, #SCOTUS *extends* the temporary pause of the district court’s order that had mandated full SNAP payments for November—keeping that ruling (and those payments) on hold through the end of the day this Thursday:
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreie57ikekngq62gkeexuwdgvrpe5kmvc7f2x3ohhuzownq7okrfpvu

2025-11-08 02:25:17 GMT

#BREAKING: Justice Jackson has issued an "administrative" stay, temporarily pausing a district court order that would've required the USDA to continue using contingency funds to pay SNAP benefits.
The stay expires 48 hours after the First Circuit rules on USDA's request for a stay pending appeal.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreifp4mxbc5wboje7eeq47j3imquxdgo4fuvpaiots3ugkk4nabgvyi
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreigbjc37v6cmybsfs56zsu2fs6q7dxy3xcdkm6bl3bjjyd7rdnvftu

2025-11-07 23:46:35 GMT

#BREAKING: The Trump administration is asking #SCOTUS for an immediate “administrative” stay of a Rhode Island district judge’s order that is otherwise requiring it to resume the distribution of SNAP benefits from other funding sources no later than the end of today.

2025-11-06 20:18:24 GMT

#BREAKING: #SCOTUS grants yet another stay to the Trump administration, putting back into place a new State Department policy requiring passports to display their bearers' biological sex at birth.
Justice Jackson (joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan) once again dissents.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreievwdoaj22wqnin73goexis4ox32ho4rn763ayuwcpji22izf5m6q
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreifytduqkuiofgg4tvhd4jhzhrdjtmfnc6m4b54kfkvlkbevx3jifi

2025-11-05 03:05:20 GMT

Really looking forward to the Speaker of the House claiming to be unaware of the election results.

2025-10-29 13:20:46 GMT

New paper from me offering a holistic assessment of [#SCOTUS's](https://bsky.app/search?q=%23SCOTUS%27s ) behavior on Trump-related emergency applications thus far:
[papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5661011 )
TL;DR: The ultimate theme of the decisions is a majority bent on preserving *their* supremacy, as such—which is likely to only be self-defeating.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreibqqbpptj34jxlrefribx5ey7krdbk6situ23k3fw5ktrnxs4w3te

2025-10-17 20:07:08 GMT

The Trump administration is seeking emergency relief at #SCOTUS again—this time in the Chicago / National Guard federalization case.
This is the 29th application the administration has filed since January 20.
It’s No. 25A443, and should be up on the website shortly.

2025-10-05 14:58:04 GMT

The very first statute authorizing domestic use of the military during domestic emergencies, enacted in 1792 by a Congress full of the same folks who wrote and ratified the Constitution, expressly provided for judicial review in certain circumstances *before* the President could even send troops.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreiafmu7chmxum77cnx7miqnd574zjyjahxkayoxcc5k4eatbuw2654

2025-09-30 02:25:05 GMT

Just a reminder that the Commander-in-Chief of the Louisiana National Guard, who can call them out all by himself if they were actually needed, is … Governor Landry.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3lzzf4zuor62a

2025-09-29 11:30:56 GMT

“Is it that the Chief Justice doesn’t accept that the Court is losing credibility on a daily basis; that he thinks the Court doesn’t need that credibility in order to fulfill its intended role in our constitutional system; or that he doesn’t care?”
Me on John Roberts as his Court turns 20 today:
[180. The Roberts Court Turns 2...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/180-the-roberts-court-turns-20 )

2025-09-22 19:15:06 GMT

#BREAKING: Over dissents from Justices Sotomayor, Kagan & Jackson, #SCOTUS grants a stay in the Slaughter case (allowing President Trump to remove the last Dem member of the FTC), *and* grants certiorari "before judgment" to decide whether to formally overrule its 1935 ruling in Humphrey's Executor.

2025-09-19 20:29:33 GMT

4:30 p.m. on a Friday, and there are *5* emergency applications from the Trump administration pending at #SCOTUS:
1) Slaughter (FTC removal);
2) Global Health Council (pocket rescissions);
3) Cook (Fed Board removal for "cause");
4) Orr (gender identity on passports); and
5) Noem (Venezuela TPS).

2025-09-12 22:57:50 GMT

I know these “interviews” with Justice Barrett are carefully scripted. But if she’s going to keeping urging Americans to “read the opinions,” and not just commentary, it sure would be nice if someone would ask her what we should do when—as is so often the case these days—there’s no opinion to read…

2025-09-10 20:09:13 GMT

Over public dissents from Justices Thomas, Alito, & Gorsuch, #SCOTUS leaves in place 4th Cir. injunction requiring a South Carolina public high school to allow a single transgender student to use the bathroom corresponding with their gender identity—stressing that it's "not a ruling on the merits."
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreicbw2ert35kaomoldtfkhitzufmhrpwh2esppmsoa3kdc3wksgkoi

2025-09-08 15:02:00 GMT

Chief Justice Roberts has issued an “administrative” stay allowing President Trump to remove the last Democratic member of Federal Trade Commission while the full Court decides whether to freeze lower-court rulings that had held that her firing was unlawful:
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreibkeyph4cdgei44vgw6wvpetmmepigtx2fhiq2sobc5tnoxyx77qa

2025-09-03 02:28:48 GMT

#BREAKING: Fifth Circuit (Southwick & Ramirez, JJ.) holds that President Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act against Tren de Aragua is unlawful, and blocks AEA removals in the Northern District of Texas (over a lengthy dissent from Judge Oldham):
[www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...](https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/25/25-10534-CV1.pdf )
[ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/2...](https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/25/25-10534-CV1.pdf )

2025-08-29 21:48:28 GMT

By a 7-4 vote, the full Federal Circuit has *affirmed* a lower-court ruling holding that many of President Trump’s tariffs exceed his statutory authority.
The ruling won’t go into effect until October 14, though—which gives the Trump administration plenty of time to seek intervention from #SCOTUS:
[storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco...](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cafc.23105/gov.uscourts.cafc.23105.159.0_1.pdf )

2025-08-22 00:30:44 GMT

“Then they came for Cracker Barrel…”

2025-08-21 20:49:33 GMT

TL;DR: 5 justices say Trump doesn't have to immediately restore the funding, but 5 *also* signal that the underlying directives are unlawful.
That sends a fairly strong (if mixed) message that Trump will lose these cases *eventually,* but only once they're brought in the Court of Federal Claims.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv/post/3lwwsjdupd22l
#note1vc6…4w5x

2025-08-21 20:41:54 GMT

Splitting 5-4 (with Chief Justice Roberts joining the three Democratic appointees in dissent), #SCOTUS grants *partial* stay to Trump administration in NIH funding case; holds that challenges to grant terminations (but *not* the underlying guidance) need to be filed in the Court of Federal Claims:
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a103_kh7p.pdf )

2025-08-15 19:49:26 GMT

The latest example of an important lower-court ruling adverse to Trump that the administration *isn’t* appealing is last Saturday’s D.C. Circuit decision about restoring public access to data on how the executive branch is (or isn’t) spending appropriated funds.
That ruling goes into effect today:
[Opinion (DC circuit)](https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26046812-opinion-dc-circuit/ )

2025-08-15 14:38:09 GMT

My own view is that it was *really* smart of D.C. to wait for the Trump admin. to overplay its hand before suing.
It's one thing to invoke the emergency police support provision of the Home Rule Act in specific cases; it's something else entirely to claim it allows the feds to *take over* the MPD.

2025-08-11 15:32:09 GMT

Two things can be true:
1) The President has legal authority over the D.C. police and the D.C. National Guard that he doesn't have *anywhere else* in the country; &
2) Even if this doesn't set a legal precedent, it sets an ominous *political* precedent for pretextually overriding local government.

2025-08-11 02:22:49 GMT

Someone forgot to take down this webpage:
[www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/v...](https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/violent-crime-dc-hits-30-year-low )
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreiflwmnajqtqww3ququffkanfy5zgywffbfmj2i5qoafy6xahkqsxm

2025-07-14 20:45:54 GMT

My quick take on Monday afternoon's unexplained #SCOTUS ruling in the Department of Education downsizing case—and how the justices' inconsistent treatment of the (similarly postured) student loan cases during the Biden administration illustrates in technicolor why the Court needs to explain itself:
[167. The Inconsistent Court St...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/167-the-inconsistent-court-strikes )

2025-07-14 19:38:43 GMT

Since April 4, #SCOTUS has issued 15 rulings on 17 emergency applications filed by Trump (three birthright citizenship apps were consolidated).
It has granted relief to Trump ... in all 15 rulings.
It has written majority opinions in only 3.
Today's order is the 7th with no explanation *at all.*
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv/post/3ltx4sgsu7k2q
#note1tk9…ngfl

2025-07-14 19:30:21 GMT

Here we go again: Over an acerbic dissenting opinion by Justice Sotomayor (joined in full by Justices Kagan and Jackson), #SCOTUS, with no explanation, grants a stay in the Department of Education RIFs case—effectively clearing the way for the Trump administration to dismantle much of the agency:
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1203_pol1.pdf )

2025-07-03 20:30:54 GMT

Over dissents from Justices Sotomayor & Jackson (and a rare concurrence from Justice Kagan), #SCOTUS "clarifies" that its 6/23 ruling staying a district court's injunction against third-country removals *also* applies to the district court's later order requiring a remedy for those already removed:
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_2co3.pdf )

2025-06-27 15:14:32 GMT

Fifth ruling from #SCOTUS is in the Texas porn age-verification case.
For a 6-3 majority (with the three Democratic appointees dissenting), Justice Thomas *upholds* Texas's age-verification scheme for porn websites against a First Amendment challenge:
[www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1122_3e04.pdf )
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1122_3e04.pdf )

2025-06-27 14:49:22 GMT

Fourth #SCOTUS ruling is in Mahmoud.
For a 6-3 majority (with the three Dem. appointees dissenting), Justice Alito sides with parents in challenge to school board's introduction of the “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs:
[www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-297_4f14.pdf )
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-297_4f14.pdf )

2025-06-27 14:40:53 GMT

Third #SCOTUS ruling is in the universal service fund (non-delegation) case.
For a 6-3 majority (with Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissenting), Justice Kagan *rejects* non-delegation challenge; upholds universal service fund structure and authority:
[www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-354_0861.pdf )
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-354_0861.pdf )

2025-06-26 14:18:49 GMT

Fourth (and *last*) ruling from #SCOTUS today is in Riley v. Bondi.
For a messy, fractured 5-4 majority (with Justice Gorsuch joining the three Democratic appointees in dissent) narrows judicial review in a small category of complicated immigration appeals:
[www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1270_6j37.pdf )
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1270_6j37.pdf )

2025-06-26 11:56:31 GMT

The Supreme Court’s unexplained order on Monday in the third-country removals case, and the continuing controversy over what it does and doesn’t mean, is Exhibit A for why the justices need to provide an explanation at least when they *grant* emergency relief.
More in today’s bonus “One First”:
[Bonus 161: Why the Court Needs...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-161-why-the-court-needs-to )

2025-06-23 21:59:29 GMT

Today’s unsigned, unexplained #SCOTUS ruling clearing the way for removals of migrants to third countries without any additional process is a disaster—not just on the merits, but because of the government misbehavior that it not only refuses to punish, but effectively rewards.
Me, via “One First”:
[161. The Court's Disastrous Ru...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/161-the-courts-disastrous-ruling )

2025-06-08 02:12:48 GMT

Here’s the “Presidential Memorandum”:
[www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/06/department-of-defense-security-for-the-protection-of-department-of-homeland-security-functions/ )
There’s no Insurrection Act invocation; Trump is federalizing 2000 CA Nat’l Guard personnel only to “protect federal functions.”
*Without* invoking the Insurrection Act, anything more would violate the Posse Comitatus Act.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreicwoikrcr3uazh34pth6x73as65qohim3hgdw5xzomofanhcyy2u4

2025-06-08 01:44:42 GMT

There are two pathways to what Trump is doing:
1) He is federalizing 2000 National Guard troops; or
2) He is deploying 2000 members of another state’s National Guard with the permission of *that* state’s governor.
These posts walk through the relevant authorities—and the questions they raise:
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv/post/3lr2mrq2klk22
#note1zzc…xcep

2025-06-08 00:38:41 GMT

Re-upping this “One First” post from April asking—and trying to answer—five questions about the domestic use of the military:
[142. Five Questions About Dome...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/142-five-questions-about-domestic )

2025-06-07 00:03:04 GMT

It’ll be interesting how the Trump administration’s remarkable ability to magically bring Abrego García back to the United States will bear on its arguments in other cases about how it really has no ability to influence the detention of others at CECOT.

2025-06-06 20:24:17 GMT

#BREAKING: #SCOTUS grants Trump administration stay in DOGE/Social Security case (restoring DOGE’s access to SSA data) over public dissents from three Democratic appointees.

2025-05-30 14:19:34 GMT

#BREAKING: #SCOTUS grants Trump administration application for stay in CHNV humanitarian parole immigration case; lets government deport those previously granted parole.
Justice Jackson, joined by Justice Sotomayor, filed an eight-page dissenting opinion.
Link to come shortly.

2025-05-22 14:09:14 GMT

#BREAKING: In Oklahoma religious charter school case, #SCOTUS splits 4-4 (with Justice Barrett recused), which means the lower-court ruling (barring the religious charter school) stands without a (precedential) opinion:
[www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-394_9p6b.pdf )
[supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf...](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-394_9p6b.pdf )

2025-05-22 12:12:31 GMT

Today’s bonus issue of “One First” takes a closer look at Judge Ho’s galling concurring opinion on remand in the A.A.R.P. Alien Enemies Act case—which accused #SCOTUS of showing “disrespect” to the district judge and President Trump by … protecting due process:
[www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-152-...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-152-judge-ho-due-process-and )
[Bonus 152: Judge Ho, Due Proce...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-152-judge-ho-due-process-and )

2025-05-21 00:26:53 GMT

I keep thinking he can’t stoop any lower—and then he does:
[reason.com/volokh/2025/...](https://reason.com/volokh/2025/05/20/the-supreme-court-unfairly-attacked-a-careful-district-court-judge-who-faithfully-discharged-his-office-under-pressure/ )
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreigjlec7xp54nubgujvqrsn23mw4zwsq44v24tfelxq5lly2hk4au4

2025-05-05 20:53:58 GMT

Even *if* you accept Stephen Miller’s (textually, historically, and morally indefensible) claim that undocumented immigrants are not entitled to due process, you’d *still* need due process to ensure that the individuals at issue are, in fact, undocumented.
His argument fails even on its own terms.

2025-04-23 02:43:35 GMT

When it’s impossible to distinguish between your blog posts and the claims that Stephen Miller is making, it might be time to just stop writing:
[reason.com/volokh/2025/...](https://reason.com/volokh/2025/04/22/a-tale-of-two-shadow-dockets/ )
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreie4xlob3rodm52xn5igzdoo7d2euwxwptvvtbn4766nt744ocb7wq
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreif5hv6f7wkgojzr5e4qo6danup5ccebj73nfelliy3cdo3rin6c6q

2025-04-21 12:29:33 GMT

Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreicdu7o2x5rirkmuu4thahrmuvxxiatn7y6b4nzmdjl65my5cc55fm

2025-04-19 15:49:04 GMT

One point that's going to get lost in the discussion of [#SCOTUS's](https://bsky.app/search?q=%23SCOTUS%27s ) intervention in the Alien Enemy Act case:
This is the *value* of nationwide injunctions. Without them, you have to go district by district, and the government can try to play games by moving people to districts without relief (yet).

2025-04-18 15:57:12 GMT

I don't really care what the "political consequences" are of fighting for the proposition that *everyone* is entitled to due process before they are removed from the United States and sent to a Salvadoran prison.
It's not really a principle if you only adhere to it when it's politically expedient.

2025-04-15 12:00:11 GMT

Either the U.S. government *is* able to exert monetary and diplomatic pressure on El Salvador sufficient to produce Abrego Garcia’s release, or it isn’t.
The latter would be either a bald-faced lie or a pretty stunning concession of our national impotence. The Vice President should pick one.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreibmpr2yjriwntqgisffzzepnmxej3blgrb43ygueimi564ascf63q

2025-04-14 17:54:19 GMT

If the U.S. government is going to take the position that, once removed from the United States, folks can’t be brought back, then it sure seems to me that federal courts should be reflexively and categorically barring *all* removals until they’re 100 percent certain that the removals are lawful.

2025-04-11 20:23:13 GMT

Before folks overreact to headlines about the judge’s ruling in the Khalil case, please note that (1) it was an immigration judge (IJ), not a federal district court; and (2) the IJ had no power to consider Khalil’s constitutional objections.
This particular decision was a fait accompli.

2025-04-10 23:11:47 GMT

The problem with this ruling is the presumption of regularity. In any other administration, a remand with instructions to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return would lead to honest representations about what is—and isn’t—possible.
In this administration, there’s no reason to expect straight answers.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv/post/3lmilc3rwr227
#note1k53…h9zv

2025-04-10 22:43:21 GMT

#BREAKING: Supreme Court holds that Trump administration must attempt to “facilitate” the return of Wilmer Armando Abrego García from El Salvador, but remands to the district court to sort out exactly what the administration can and must do going forward:
[s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25...](https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25894464/24a949-order.pdf )
[s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2589...](https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25894464/24a949-order.pdf )

2025-04-04 22:51:32 GMT

The question isn’t whether a federal court can order the Salvadoran government to release Garcia; it can’t.
It’s whether the U.S. government has the ability to secure Garcia’s release. If so, then it can be ordered to do so, because then Garcia is in the “constructive” custody of the United States.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:t4x2ruk2qmob2b2cx55h4v7r/post/3llzhu2xmys2u

2025-04-02 11:23:09 GMT

The last day on which a majority of the Supreme Court’s justices had been appointed by Democratic presidents was May 14, 1969.
One of the things we do in the legal academy is support our claims with facts.
https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:nwnlnixtjh3qhkwpz2uy5uwv&cid=bafkreig7dffgfyqqbawuqed2krjef2swyh4hsf3eymi7p2psrxbjk5nmnq

2025-03-31 11:26:41 GMT

"If this many different judges in this many different courts appointed by this many different presidents are blocking this many policies promulgated by the same president, we ought to be able to agree that the problem is the policies—not the judges."
[www.stevevladeck.com/p/136-settin...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/136-setting-the-record-straight-on )
[136. Setting the Record Straig...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/136-setting-the-record-straight-on )

2025-03-30 13:15:45 GMT

As of Friday, there have been 46 cases in which federal judges have blocked Trump policies.
The rulings in those cases have come from 39 different judges appointed by 5 different presidents (of both parties) to 11 different district courts across 7 different circuits.
Maybe it's not the judges?

2025-03-27 12:56:59 GMT

Today’s bonus issue of “One First” uses Tuesday’s executive order on elections to illustrate what a President can (and, as importantly, *can’t*) do through an executive order—and how major media organizations should do better in reporting on them:
[www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-134-...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-134-what-executive-orders-can )
[Bonus 134: What Executive Orde...](https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-134-what-executive-orders-can )

2025-03-16 12:33:09 GMT

Seven of my colleagues and friends at Columbia Law have written a compelling (and, in my view unanswerable) response to the unprecedented Title VI demand letter that the Trump administration recently sent to Columbia University:
[balkin.blogspot.com/2025/03/a-ti...](https://balkin.blogspot.com/2025/03/a-title-vi-demand-letter-that-itself.html )
[Balkinization: A Title VI Dema...](https://balkin.blogspot.com/2025/03/a-title-vi-demand-letter-that-itself.html )