Super Testnet

Freelance dev w/ bitcoin focus | supertestnet.org

bc1qefhunyf8rsq77f38k07hn2e5njp0acxhlheksn

Public Key

npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399s

NIP-57 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqszrqlfgavys8g0zf8mmy79dn92ghn723wwawx49py0nqjn7jtmjagpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wc9k45up

Publishing to

nos.lol

nostr.oxtr.dev

nostr.mom

Author Public Key

npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399s

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-08-27 20:27:42

- reply

speaking of my discography...I released a new song today! It's not about nostr though
https://stacker.news/items/663764

2024-08-24 19:32:13

Reminder: tomorrow is my livestreamed Cashu Workshop! Get your ticket today to learn how chaumian ecash works and create a toy implementation of a cashu enabled wallet. For only $20.
Tickets available here: https://supertestnet.org/workshops.html

2024-08-21 05:44:03

- reply

How do I set up amethyst to use amber as a signer? I don't see an option for that in Settings

2024-08-21 05:42:09

- reply

Why not? Right now I have my nsec in app A. You want me to download another app (app B) and put my nsec in there. Doesn't it make sense for me to object and say I just want to keep it in app A alone? If not, why not?

2024-08-21 02:08:20

- reply

People helpfully provided links to Amber for me. But I'm confused. Why should I put my privkey in amber when I already have it in amethyst? Can you make *amethyst* an nsecbunker backend?

2024-08-21 01:10:52

- reply

I don't see it in my app store search results. Do I have to sideload the app? Where can I get it? https://image.nostr.build/f895780f42952ff15fb75d8c5c6cd5d55d8c3d80aafb655fb2511ca9615d6ae9.jpg

2024-08-21 00:18:55

I want to rebrand nsecbunker as "sign-via-dm"
Nostr clients like amethyst by @nprofile…pyug and damus by @nprofile…tlun should implement it so that I can use desktop nostr apps without importing my privkey to a new app or extension. The desktop clients just "dm" my phone client with an event to sign and I approve it on my phone.
Let's make it happen!

2024-08-19 22:02:25

Only 6 days til my workshop on Cashu!
https://supertestnet.org/workshops.html
Sign up and learn how to develop your own Cashu wallet (as well as how cashu works) for only $20

2024-08-19 07:21:51

- reply

Bisq and robosats are DNMs because they are marketplaces on the darknet. They compete directly with other DNMs on products such as cash parcels, gift cards, and currency swaps.
I doubt any of the commonly used silk road descendants (good term!) support LN yet but I suspect they are looking since their competitors are doing it and seeing millions in volume. Their incentive is to attract those users to their platforms.

2024-08-19 04:38:01

- reply

Three that I know of so far: Bisq, Robosats, and Shopstr
Link for Robosats: http://robodexarjwtfryec556cjdz3dfa7u47saek6lkftnkgshvgg2kcumqd.onion/
Link for Shopstr: http://iftfujvg3tv6v5fcilgswbkkntdfd7bphyuth6zfyghqrwj3kowxwbad.onion/

2024-08-19 02:52:51

Monero bros down bad as *yet another* DNM adds lightning
LN has better privacy than monero
Standard caveat: do not use either one for serious privacy needs without also adopting additional defense in depth strategies
#nevent1q…nch3

2024-08-18 07:15:40

Is Bankify the first app I've made with an actual user? https://image.nostr.build/3c965cb4adc16449552586c13cea67a040dac6185f3fd650e2b6b0df9ebef920.jpg

2024-08-17 20:38:08

- reply

For more details, I encourage readers to listen to this debate I had with Luke Parker (monero dev):
https://x.com/super_testnet/status/1824431745443279044

2024-08-16 19:22:48

- reply

I have no idea but for a stab in the dark I would guess under 20% is using bolt12

2024-08-16 12:38:42

- reply

Re: #3, the last hop doesn't know the amount being sent because of multipath, etc., and he does not know the recipient because he does not know he is the last hop. Onions are padded at each step so that they are always 1300 bytes. So the last hop thinks he might be the first hop with up to 19 more to go.
Re: "by default," lightning nodes don't expose your IP address to the public by default because the only way that happens is if you (1) configure your node to route payments (it doesn't do it by default) and (2) choose clearnet instead of tor.
Re: the podcast, we recorded it a few days ago and I am excited for its presumably looming release. I made this chart in part based on things I learned while preparing for the de ate, like the fact that monero does not encrypt peer to peer traffic. Dandelion++ is nice but if several of your peers are fednodes logging all of your IP traffic they can learn a lot.

2024-08-16 08:53:46

- reply

(1) Regarding the left side of your charts, you write that monero does not (red x) publish all transactions by default, but it does. Here they are: https://localmonero.co/blocks/
(2) Still on the left side, you write that monero encrypts the sender and the recipient, but it does not. If it did, you could name the encryption standard it uses for that. But it doesn't, so you can't. (Lightning uses the Sphinx encryption standard for that.)
(3) On the right side of your chart, you write that lightning does not (red x) encrypt the recipient or the amount from all nodes. It does. It uses the Sphinx encryption standard for that. Not even the last node in the route knows who the recipient is or what amount the sender sent.
(4) Still on the right side, you write that lightning does not (red x) hide your ip address by default. It does. Lightning wallets and nodes do not reveal their ip addresses by default. To reveal your ip address, you first have to set up port forwarding on the standard lightning port (or pick a different one), and then you have to make a choice: do you want to reveal your *real* ip address or use tor? Most people choose to use tor which is why over 70% of lightning nodes are on tor:
https://i.ibb.co/ggYyDy5/list-of-tor-nodes-on-ln.png
source: https://bitcoin.clarkmoody.com/dashboard/

2024-08-16 05:02:33

- reply

Found another transparency chain shill! Have fun staying public bro. Maybe someday people will use your useless altcoin and pump your bags

2024-08-16 05:00:07

- reply

It is for bolt11 and bolt12

2024-08-16 04:13:06

https://i.ibb.co/CMQx4b2/monero-lightning-comparison-chart.png

2024-08-14 23:21:42

- reply

https://cdn3.emoji.gg/emojis/6413_depression.png

2024-08-14 19:03:10

I made it into NOBS this week! Mission accomplished
#nevent1q…9a69

2024-08-14 02:07:34

- reply

Too memorable?

2024-08-13 23:38:55

- reply

reminds me of Nostr Terminal:
https://github.com/cmdruid/nostr-terminal

2024-08-13 22:47:12

- reply

I feel like Sean Parker would tell me "drop the 'un' -- it's cleaner that way"

2024-08-13 22:23:58

My latest invention is Bankify: turn any cashu mint into a lightning wallet with NWC support
https://stacker.news/items/647681

2024-08-09 20:34:31

- reply

Maybe robot A has a chicken and robot B wants it. But robot B has wheat and robot A wants that. If robot A and robot B can trade with one another right then and there, great, but what if robot A doesn't want wheat *right now*? He won't trade. And maybe when he *does* want wheat, robot B won't want a chicken anymore. With money (i.e. bitcoin) that both robots accept for all goods, robot B can trade *money* for the chicken and robot A can *save* it, and when he wants wheat later he knows robot B wants money (because you can buy *anything* with it) so he has confidence he can buy the wheat with it.

2024-08-09 01:54:17

"Brooklyn bathhouse heats water with Bitcoin mining"
Source: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/brooklyn-bathhouse-heats-water-with-bitcoin-mining/
Alternative headline: "Brooklyn bathhouse cools bitcoin miner with human bodies"
There's only one way this goes...
https://image.nostr.build/95dee423d862903c7d7f554cd192ca8f2d2981a672d779edbe34a19871eb0e6e.jpg

2024-08-08 03:45:04

- reply

I don't know what you featureset is so it's hard to say
I suspect if more services add support for login-via-dm then it will be easier to add sign-via-dm next, send then I can just use one client to interact with all supporting services. Sign-via-dm also needs clients to support it though. But I nag client devs and server devs equally so let's get to it!

2024-08-06 20:34:54

- reply

yes, let them hear me croon!

2024-08-06 20:22:25

- reply

not yet afaik, that's an nsecbunker feature though. I would love to see support for that added to, including in more clients. I should be able to give a website on the desktop my public key and when it wants me to sign a message with my *private* key, it asks the client I use on my phone, which then prompts me to approve the signature request. In the background the two devices can talk over nostr to share the signature requests and signature approvals and such.

2024-08-06 20:16:18

- reply

it's good. It is also an available login method in the library I linked in my feature request for wavlake

2024-08-06 20:10:38

- reply

(1) It doesn't work well on mobile
(2) I already have my private key in an app that supports DMs, so if I can log in with that, I'd rather not put my private key in another app
(3) your tool looks very neat, good job!

2024-08-06 20:08:45

- reply

I'm glad nip07 is available for those who like it
the curse is the "only" part

2024-08-06 19:30:03

- reply

yeah but I want to use this opportunity to help curb the spread of the nip07-only virus

2024-08-06 18:53:29

- reply

I reached out to them about fixing their login issues (they only support nip07 login which I don't like) so we'll see what happens. If they add login-via-DM, I will upload my music there.
njump.me/nevent1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg7waehxw309ahx7um5wgkhqatz9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2ap0qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9uq3yamnwvaz7tmwdaehgun4v5hxxmmd9uq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvtcpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn89uqzqq9es2p9nmunmqu4aggmynwdfgnyc6d2ukzl5pw9k576pstt39tgz55w8r

2024-08-06 18:51:47

hey @nprofile…hjhd can you add the ability to log into wavlake by means of a DM'd login code? Support for this method was recently added to https://github.com/nostrband/nostr-login and it makes it a lot easier for mobile users. You just enter your nprofile, get a login code in your regular nostr client, and paste it into the website you're logging into.
It also makes it so I don't have to install a browser extension whose code I don't want to review and trust. Thanks! Holding off on uploading my music to your site for now but please let me know if it's feasible or if there's anything I can help with to *make it* feasible.

2024-08-06 17:06:35

- reply

Thank you https://x.com/PlebLab for producing!

2024-08-06 17:02:17

My latest single goes out to all the bitcoin ladies
https://x.com/actuallyCarlaKC https://x.com/amizi https://x.com/ClaraShik https://x.com/D_plus__plus https://x.com/Dulce_xyz https://x.com/glowzow https://x.com/hazelbiologist https://x.com/niftynei https://x.com/NinjaGrannyHodl https://x.com/plebpoet https://x.com/starkness and so many more!
(Alphabetized to hide my crushes)
https://supertestnet.github.io/songs/Super%20Testnet%20-%20Who%20Wrote%20the%20Code.mp3

2024-08-05 23:09:21

- reply

> You didn't trace anything
I did. I identified this pubkey as the sender: 23396ea4b0ab93e3417c3650d47b1c8414bb593d7fc9cdb1b27244e139645302
The rest are the decoys. My tool uses on-chain data and two heuristics to identify the true spend. The two heuristics are explained on my github:
https://github.com/supertestnet/examiner/
Someone told you monero can't be traced by they were wrong. Ciphertrace has a tool for tracing them and now I've released a free and open source alternative.

2024-08-05 22:24:08

- reply

My monero tracing tool automatically identifies the sender of this transaction: c97d96fe61b2aee18a04fdb0975594c7e6d3334036e0e57e70666b9e5fe309b3
Try it here: https://supertestnet.github.io/examiner/
It seems to only be able to identify the sender in about 1 out of 15 transactions, but that's not nothing. I suspect tools with more data (like Ciphertrace's monero tracing tool, linked on my examinr github repo) do a better job of this, but it's silly to claim monero can't be traced in the face of two tools that at least sometimes trace it

2024-08-05 21:10:22

- reply

"they are traceable" and "I personally have the resources to trace them" are different things

2024-08-05 21:09:06

- reply

thank you, that (final paragraph) is excellent feedback and a very good idea

2024-08-05 19:17:57

- reply

> it's impossible to know which is the true spend
Not impossible. My tool *automatically* detects the true spend 1 in 15 times. Better tools (like ciphertrace's) do better.
Lightning is superior.

2024-08-05 19:16:31

Why do people prefer LN to XMR?
- better privacy
- doesn't leak info about sender/recipient/amount
- better merchant experience
- no hassle with consolidating outputs and warnings this will ruin your privacy
- better user experience
- wider acceptance and doesn't keep you poor

2024-08-05 18:51:18

- reply

> in the context of a cryptocurrency a "transaction tracing tool" would be able to identify the source, destination and amount of transactions
I don't think it has to automatically do that. A tracing tool is good if it helps automate some parts of the tracing task even if other parts remain manual.
> random chance identifies the sender in "about 1 of 15 cases"
But random guessing uses no data. This tool uses *data* to identify the sender. A random guess would not be grounds for doing anything. A statistical analysis is worth a lot more.
> the recipient that is published on-chain is a one time stealth address. not useful for tracing since SAs break the transaction graph.
They do not break the transaction graph. Stealth addresses do not appear just once, they appear again whenever the recipient spends his money and possibly in other transactions as decoys. Filtering out the decoys leaves you with only the true spend tx. You can do that *because* there is a tx graph that stealth addresses appear multiple times in.
> and amounts remain opaque
Except part of the amount is visible (the fee) and gives you info about the amount in the outputs as well as in the inputs
> additionally, if it takes "a considerable amount of off-chain information" to *actually use* NOBODY is tracing monero transactions
Seems like you contradict yourself here. First you say "nobody" and argue that the data doesn't exist, then you admit some people might do it and governments might have that data.
Not a good look.

2024-08-05 18:40:57

- reply

Someone challenged me to trace his transaction to its source yesterday on Bawdy Anarchist's twitter space and I denied the ability to do so. I want to build more automatic decoy eliminators because without them you need lots of off chain data that I don't know how to get or that is expensive to acquire. I am not sure how far you can get using only chain heuristics to identify the true spender; I suspect it's higher than 1 in 15 but lower than 100%.
One monero dev offered a helpful cli tool that detects all instances when a stealth address has appeared in a ring; this is something my tool is currently missing and would greatly help with building taint trees. I hope that through community effort my tool continues to improve in effectivelness. The bad guys shouldn't be the only ones with a tool like this, and before yesterday only ciphertrace had a tool like this (that I know of anyway)

2024-08-05 18:34:42

- reply

I replied to your comment, looks like you misunderstand how monero works. You said stealth addresses are used once and never seen again but in reality they appear on the blockchain multiple times: when the recipient receives money, when he or she spends that money, and possibly multiple other times as decoys

2024-08-05 18:26:58

- reply

Then help me fix it please
I'd like it to be up to par with the ciphertrace tool that inspired me
I'm sure they have a lot more data to work with but I suspect you can get pretty far with on chain heuristics and maybe it's not that hard to source whatever off chain data ciphertrace is using

2024-08-05 04:09:43

- reply

they always have been
but it seems to take a considerable amount of manual work
I only have two automated heuristics right now and they only identify the sender in about 1 in 15 cases
I plan to add about four more automated heuristics but I still think you'll need a considerable amount of off chain data entry to get really good data

2024-08-04 21:35:53

- reply

Which claim doesn't match? A lot of people seem to be assuming, wrongly, that this is a *fully automated* tracing tool. It's not. Most of it is manual.

2024-08-04 21:21:10

- reply

I have a way to manually identify yourself as a decoy but I haven't automated that yet. What I want to do is use known "view keys" to identify decoys, because if you have the view key you know the "true" tx in which you spent your own coin, do if you've been used as a decoy you can automatically filter that out.
Right now it uses two heuristics: merge analysis and recency bias. If you received coins in two very close blocks and then spend them together, your ring, which should contain keys from random blocks, will have two suspiciously close blocks where you held both inputs. So you can identify those as the real spender's coins.
Recency bias takes advantage of the fact that most decoy selection algorithms are biased toward selecting keys from recently created utxos. Ones that are significantly older stick out like a sore thumb.
Other metrics I want to add include bot detection (which is based on identifying txs with many outputs, since these tend to be created by automated software rather than a real person) and taint tree analysis (which creates trees of possible senders fanning out backward in time from a known destination).

2024-08-04 21:14:58

- reply

If you found a false statement, please point it out

2024-08-04 20:23:36

My latest invention is eXaMineR: a free and open source tool for tracing monero transactions
Learn more here: https://stacker.news/items/634963

2024-08-03 22:11:04

- reply

There is evidence that usage of robosats is on the rise: https://supertestnet.github.io/robostats/
It does millions of dollars in volume per year BUT that is still small relative to its bigger DNM competitors
It also has a better user experience than it's competitors so I hope it keeps growing and eventually dominates that part of the economy

2024-08-03 22:07:36

- reply

Yes

2024-08-03 22:07:16

- reply

Not yet. Want to try it with me today?

2024-08-03 04:29:37

One of my projects was featured on SNL this week. It was a good week!
#nevent1q…wtqy

2024-08-02 21:18:27

- reply

Fedi* not fed

2024-08-02 21:18:06

- reply

Yeah but he probably shouldn't
Having multiple people run the backend independently is a good way of distributing risk but it's not right to call that a federation
They don't "co own" a single robosats "address" like a federation would. They are all independent
Would be interesting if they all ran a fed instance though and custodied all the bitcoins there, then they could truly call it a federation
But I think I prefer the current model

2024-08-01 20:32:01

- reply

he also says they *do* have a probabilistic tool
but you do you
have fun staying public! I really hope you enjoy your transparency chain
meanwhile I'll keep using lightning where we *don't* publish every single one of our transactions for every to analyze

2024-08-01 19:51:20

- reply

It doesn't sound *that* hard to replace. I think fee credits are just a service agreement where Acinq holds custody of your sats until you accumulate enough to do a base layer transaction to open a new channel or enlarge an existing one. You could probably use ecash mints as a drop-in replacement: accumulate sats on an ecash mint until the user has enough to open or enlarge a channel, then do so.

2024-08-01 19:40:58

- reply

He also informed me that this exists: https://news.bitcoin.com/ciphertrace-enhanced-monero-tracing-capabilities-governments/
So when people ask me "Then why does chainalysis have an LN risk assessment tool?" I can answer "For the same reason ciphertrace has one for monero: because exchanges will pay for it even if it doesn't work well"

2024-08-01 19:17:18

- reply

I offer a nostr workshop where you build your own nostr client. It includes a segment where you configure your new self-made client to send/receive money using NWC and zaps. The workshop was recorded and you can purchase a copy here: https://supertestnet.org/workshops.html?option=nostr

2024-08-01 19:15:33

A very sweet XMR user held an intervention today and met me in real life to persuade me that my arguments against monero are "not in good faith." He did not. But he did convince me that this would be very good: a tool as easy to use as phoenixd but that connects to multiple LSPs.

2024-07-31 22:17:31

- reply

maybe instead of whining all day about how your competitors "don't count" you could step up your game and build something that competes

2024-07-31 20:22:05

- reply

If you think I've said something wrong please point out the error. I'm using the term DNM as a standard term for a marketplace hosted on tor et. al. That's what robosats is. Just because it's a niche market (a market for money) doesn't make it not a market.

2024-07-31 18:41:28

- reply

robosats shows us the way
let's make more stuff like robosats and obsolete the government's fakenet

2024-07-31 18:00:26

https://i.ibb.co/Px2BqN1/robosats-meme.png

2024-07-31 05:40:06

- reply

True. I will try to remember to call out this incorrect nomenclature in the future

2024-07-31 00:32:07

- reply

instead of having one dude run the backend there are now four people running it and users have to pick which one they want to use in their trades. So the *total* amount of custodied btc is split up among four people, which is a bit like a federation if you squint. They call it the federated model.

2024-07-30 22:21:01

- reply

someone took my workshop! :D

2024-07-30 22:09:57

New website for tracking robosats stats:
https://supertestnet.github.io/robostats/
I made this because a few months before switching to the federated model whoever was running https://learn.robosats.com/stats/ stopped updating it, and I miss having these stats handy, especially when I'm arguing with monero people about whether there are any lightning-only darknet markets with significant usage. Robosats is probably the best example of that.

2024-07-29 15:04:17

- reply

The wallet alone can spend from it. It's the wallet's address and no one else's.

2024-07-28 20:41:59

- reply

> you're claiming there's some determalistic (or even some general probabilist method) that undermines monero privacy?
I'm not claiming that. But I think that's what this privacy expert claims: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s3EbSKDA3o
> so what's your fucking problem?
My problem is that monero people claim it is private while permanently publishing massive amounts of info about each of their transactions -- something lightning fixes, even though a few monero influencers like to ignore that.

2024-07-28 20:37:16

- reply

> Bitcoin got rid of block explorers?
Yes, we use lightning now. You should try it! Freedom from block explorers, dude! It's an amazing thing

2024-07-28 20:36:19

- reply

Oh yeah and with monero, every transaction publishes a list including the sender, the recipient, and partial amount info (specifically, the fee paid). It's on every monero block explorer, go take a look.

2024-07-28 20:35:44

- reply

True, but the lightning network does not have a block explorer, so I recommend using that instead

2024-07-28 20:35:03

- reply

Routing nodes do not know what amount is being transmitted. They only know the amount *they've* been asked to forward, they have no idea if that's the full amount.
I don't know what persuaded monero guys that publishing their transactions is good for their privacy but it's an obvious problem that bitcoin fixes.

2024-07-28 20:31:06

- reply

Lightning doesn't have terrible receiver privacy despite false claims to the contrary. Bolt11 "invoices" had terrible privacy by default, but you could (1) manually wrap them (2) manually replace your key with an ephemeral one (3) use keysend instead. Keysend payments never exposed the recipient, but they also didn't give the sender a "proof of payment." Now we have bolt12 as an arising standard that *also* doesn't expose the recipient by default, and *does* give the sender a proof of payment.
Also: the recipient's ip address is not exposed by default. You have to manually configure your network to do port forwarding if you want to show up as a routing node, and that is a big reason why most lightning users do not route payments. And most users who *do* route payments opt to do it over tor so that they *don't* expose their ip address.

2024-07-28 06:53:44

- reply

The block explorers are the whole problem bro. That's why we got rid of them. Learn the lesson. If you've got a block explorer, you've got a very serious privacy problem.

2024-07-28 06:43:32

- reply

> Monero's privacy is better than Bitcoin
Wishful thinking won't mask your transactions, friend. Someone convinced you that publishing all of your transactions on a permanent blockchain is good for your privacy when it obviously isn't. Bitcoin leapfrogged way past monero six years ago when we created a payment channel network and stopped broadcasting all of our activity for the whole world to see. Catch up. Use lightning. Stop listing the sender, the recipient, and partial amount info in every transaction. Drop monero.

2024-07-28 04:00:19

- reply

"why are you lying to people?"
I'm not. The recipient's address is a key that you publish in plaintext, unencrypted, in every transaction. Why? Why not use the lightning network and avoid publishing the destination at all?
"yeah, that's how ring sigs work"
Do better: use payment channels and *don't* tell the whole world forever a list of possible senders with a public proof of your membership in that set. Again, you're not identifying a lie, just because you don't like the truth doesn't make it a lie. Lightning beats the pants off the outdated "privacy" tech used in monero. Get up to speed with the rest of us.
"what is the problem with knowing the fee?"
It is information about the amount sent, that's what. In lightning, we conceal that. In monero, you publish it. Catch up. Stop hurting your own privacy. Drop monero and use lightning.

2024-07-28 03:54:35

- reply

> Money must not have a destination
Monero, however, does. Bitcoin does too but at least with bitcoin you can prevent the sender from knowing where the money went.

2024-07-28 03:53:42

- reply

It is not disingenuous. The recipient alone has the private key; it's his address, whose else would it be? Point 2 is the honest truth: the sender puts the recipient's address in plaintext on the blockchain and if the recipient ever decides to send it he has to identify it on the blockchain again as a possible sender

2024-07-28 03:50:52

- reply

It relates to the recipient. He alone has the private key. And it will show up on the blockchain again as a possible sender if he ever decides to send the money to someone. This is not deceptive; it is the truth about monero's transparent blockchain.

2024-07-27 22:21:58

- reply

#2 is completely true. Monero users publish the recipient's stealth address in every transaction, in plain text. The money *ends up* in a different address (one that is *derived from* the stealth address), but you still publish an address belonging to your recipient, in plain text, in every transaction. And that's just a stupid thing to do. Use payment channels, bro.
https://image.nostr.build/b19eb779ec777f0ec8bae53c55c679e0bcaa5a49cf1fa194c42888f12873d84e.jpgobuserd

2024-07-27 20:06:30

- reply

Meanwhile, in monero, the amount is encrypted but the fee isn't
Also, the sender publishes the recipient's address and the change address in plaintext
And he publishes a list of possible senders and a public proof that he is one of them https://image.nostr.build/7abb9c125fd8f3f3c0680de658285831f42272bd33195f72af1bfe4770b6e1e5.jpg

2024-07-27 19:42:17

https://image.nostr.build/6bdb0e75384dc9ec543166a7349636a32e609241dbd77ee4483e2ae3dae2deff.jpg

2024-07-27 08:48:45

- reply

- Learn how to write your first application using the nostr message protocol
- Connect your app to a bitcoin wallet using Nostr Wallet Connect to send and receive money
- Programmatically zap your friends and followers and receive money to any lightning address

2024-07-26 23:51:04

- reply

If so, please deposit it in your nearest waste bin, the natural home of larper wannab altcoins like monero

2024-07-26 22:43:14

- reply

Your link says: "Bitcoin is not available as a payment method during account sign-up"

2024-07-26 22:42:54

- reply

thank you, I did not see the free account option

2024-07-26 22:42:08

- reply

I stand corrected. There is a free option here that I didn't see: https://proton.me/mail/pricing

2024-07-26 22:31:23

My Nostr workshop yesterday almost had a fatal error! 😨 😨 😨
My wallet stopped heeding my NWC commands. Some quick action barely let me recover.
Purchase the workshop video for only $5: https://supertestnet.org/workshops.html?option=nostr
And sign up for next month's Cashu workshop! https://supertestnet.org/workshops.html

2024-07-26 22:15:30

How come ProtonMail doesn't let you pay with bitcoin to create an account? They let you "top up" with bitcoin but to create an account you have to use a KYC's payment method. Are they just a CIA honeypot all this time?

2024-07-25 19:15:46

Reminder: today is the last day you can sign up for my Nostr Workshop tonight at 7pm! My website has already begun selling tickets to *next month's* workshop (which is about Cashu!). If you still want to sign up for today's workshop, pay here: https://supertestnet.org/support.html and then contact me here on nostr to receive your ticket

2024-07-25 01:19:18

- reply

Yeah but I also posted this message on x so we good fam

2024-07-25 00:09:53

- reply

all the testnets are super to me

2024-07-24 22:32:20

Today I added a new feature to statechainjs: Proof of Reserves & Liabilities!
Eat your heart out, x.com/notgrubles_ -- I know you've wanted to see this for a long time in ecash software, well, maybe statechains are close enough
https://image.nostr.build/be40455e9004d564c9be1b58ae4d7e1d45a2114929f3818a9bd53a15f2b4f11f.gif

2024-07-24 22:18:14

- reply

To make this easier, today I added a "Proof of Liabilities" button which only shows you information pertinent to proving that (1) an address on bitcoin has enough money to pay you your liabilities (2) you have a key in that address (3) you have enough signatures from the operator to let you withdraw your money unilaterally after a timelock
These items are sufficient to prove that the reserves exist and that the liabilities toward you exist...but they do not prove you will actually be paid, because a malicious operator could steal the money from the proof_of_reserves address with help from a prior holder of your statecoin