MAGIC INTERNET MONEY

Public Key

npub10a4heyt5gkz8twt8tx0gey08fk7unnuvyuf5rh02tdxcppkt0d8s3y5s6r

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs876muj96ytpr4h9n4n85vj8n5m0wfe7xzwy6pmh49knvqsm9hkncppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5qs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds7q4wqn

Publishing to

nostr.mom

nos.lol

nostr.bitcoiner.social

Author Public Key

npub10a4heyt5gkz8twt8tx0gey08fk7unnuvyuf5rh02tdxcppkt0d8s3y5s6r

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-15 20:14:43 GMT

- reply

"Privacy is a behavior not a token" is a slogan, not an argument. Behaviors run on protocols. The protocol either gives you privacy or it doesn't.
BTC + Lightning + Tor + Phoenix is a stack, sure. It's also a stack with on-chain anchors that are fully public, channel opens/closes that leak counterparty graphs, and a Lightning routing layer that's been shown deanonymizable by anyone running enough nodes. Phoenix is custodial-adjacent — ACINQ runs the LSP and sees your channel state. That's "verify or trust"? You're trusting ACINQ, Tor exit nodes, and the assumption that channel-balance probing doesn't work. None of those are math.
On the VC point — fair, ZEC has VC backing. Phoenix is ACINQ, a French company that took venture money. Lightning Labs took $70M+ from VCs including a16z. Strike is VC-funded. Blockstream is VC-funded. If "VCs touched it" disqualifies a stack, your stack is gone too.
The actual question is whether the cryptography does what it claims. Lightning over Tor is a behavioral mitigation on top of a transparent ledger. Shielded ZEC and XMR are cryptographic constructions that don't leak in the first place. There's a difference between "I hid my behavior on a public chain" and "the chain doesn't record the data."
Verify or trust — agreed. Verify the math. Halo 2 has no trusted setup. Lightning's privacy assumes nobody is running adversarial routing nodes, which is an empirical bet, not a proof.

2026-05-15 19:48:47 GMT

- reply

Most of this is wrong or applies equally to Monero.
IP leakage isn't a Zcash problem, it's a network-layer problem. Run anything without Tor/I2P and your ISP sees it. Same for XMR. Tor is intergrated into ZODL
"Nobody uses shielded" was true in 2020. As of March 2026 it's ~86% of activity and ~31% of supply is shielded. Zashi defaults to shielded.
Trusted setup: Sprout is deprecated, holds 0.2% of supply. Orchard uses Halo 2, no trusted setup. Toxic waste enables counterfeiting, not deanonymization
View keys aren't a backdoor. Monero has them too. They're user-controlled selective disclosure. If that's disqualifying, XMR is also disqualified.
Dev fund was ~8 years not 10, and is now restructured. Fair critique of funding centralization, wrong numbers. But the funding model will give ZEC a huge dev and research evolution edge.
On the actual crypto: Monero uses ring signatures — a mixer with a 16-member anonymity set per transaction. That's not "superior privacy," it's a tiny anonymity set vulnerable to statistical heuristics, decoy-selection flaws, EAE attacks, and temporal analysis. Chainalysis has been making real progress on XMR for years specifically because 16 decoys leaks signal. Zcash's Orchard pool gives you an anonymity set of every shielded note in the pool — millions, not sixteen. That's a genuine cryptographic gap, not a marketing point.
FCMP++ closes that gap on paper, sure — for chain-layer anonymity-set size after FCMP++ ships, yes. For privacy as an end-to-end practical property, it's still contested and depends on your threat model. Post quantum- no.
And on quantum: ring signatures + Pedersen commitments are not post-quantum secure. A CRQC breaks XMR's anonymity retroactively — every transaction ever made becomes deanonymizable. Zcash is moving to Project Tachyon for full post-quantum privacy by 2027 with quantum-recoverable wallets shipping mid-2026. Monero is still researching it. If you actually care about long-horizon privacy, that matters.
Things that are genuinely true: XMR dominates DNM/merchants, is more decentralized, no VCs. Real point. The "government op from A to Z" framing is what people reach for when they've run out of technical argument.
The actual debate is mandatory vs optional privacy and the tradeoffs that flow from it.

2026-05-15 16:50:14 GMT

- reply

I really don't have the time to expand on all of these. But most of the above is incorrect?
Odd reply. All the best with Monero 👍
Brilliant project.

2026-05-15 15:35:00 GMT

- reply

Monero is great, I agree. Love the project and support it. The CPU mining is a big win.
Zcash just does a better job for privacy.
All open source.

2026-05-15 13:28:56 GMT

- reply

ZCash solves this.