vetehinen

Public Key

npub17wrnwmzqac8lfkc2p6nqk8vqag27xezdugpa5h7eh9c6yrf0xwrqsf7cz9

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs08pehd3qwurl5mv9qafstrkqw590rv3x7yq76tlvmjudzp5hn8pspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsyusvy6

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub17wrnwmzqac8lfkc2p6nqk8vqag27xezdugpa5h7eh9c6yrf0xwrqsf7cz9

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-08-01 20:02:03

- reply

on the bright side it seems to me like the number of accounts that have it enabled has grown well. Entirely anecdotal but I just seem to find more journalists and others to follow from there than ever.
I do remain just as sceptical about their intentions unless this feature becomes popular enough for them to think twice before killing it at some point.

2024-05-31 23:24:26

- reply

is there any information available on what the stance of the various European parliament groups is on the issue?

2024-05-05 17:53:02

- reply

Threads only pushes to the fediverse and doesn't take anything in right now so there is nothing to opt-in to for us currently. It's true they might not start asking even when this becomes bidirectional but not sure. I hope they won't make it opt-in tbh.
But when it comes to how it works now I don't see the difference between Threads and this Bluesky bridge. Just like you can run into posts from Threads without having followed any Threads account you can still run into posts from Bluesky here despite not having opted in to the Bridgy fed bridge.

2024-05-05 11:21:54

- reply

well to be fair many people might be shouting for threads to be opt-in if Meta had not chosen to make it so anyway and also the anti-threads energy was channeled more into demands of a complete fediblock

2024-05-02 20:15:10

- reply

could swear I've seen someone say #threads is planning to not allow such things but then again that could have been just speculation although I would not be surprised.
That said, I think I might actually prefer it that way because it is another reason for people to come to this side of the fediverse instead of using Threads.

2024-04-18 14:12:41

- reply

what kind of negativity are you seeing and is there much of it? I've seen a weird comment by someone acting like threads is some exclusive club, disinterest because of the limited interaction (for now) and (legitimate) concerns about the inability to limit who can reply but being only on this side of the fediverse my exposure has obviously been limited since I only see posts from those who have actually enabled it.

2024-04-15 16:19:16

- reply

based on info from maybe a week ago it is at least around 3k total now but that is still same order of magnitude and I doubt it has crossed 10k yet.
[@[email protected]](https://social.beaware.live/@BeAware)

2024-04-07 10:03:01

- reply

Interesting. I don't suppose there was any specific reason identified for why they were being blocked?
[@[email protected]](https://fedibird.com/@noellabo)

2024-03-31 22:45:14

- reply

that is definitely possible since I already saw a Threads user suggest this. Threads lets you limit who can reply to a post so some users find it problematic there that this isn't possible with the Fediverse integration. Limiting to local on an individual post level would allow them to keep Fedi sharing on while also using the feature Threads has. That said, since it is impossible to really limit who can comment a post if it is public I'd rather see something that would offer implementation of this on the fediverse even if it isn't foolproof. #fediverse #threads

2024-03-25 22:25:55

- reply

I think it's too early to be disappointed but I'd definitely like to see more. People with #threads accounts need to go do some advocacy to get more people to enable it I guess. I also saw something about the option not being there for some big accounts despite the correct region, but don't know any specifics so might not be anything there.